Skip to content
Zach Pyron

#8Zach Pyron

Zach Pyron is a Dual-Threat QB for Georgia Tech. Zach's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 84 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zach Pyron's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
35/65 Comp/Att409 Pass yards2 Pass TD3 INT53.8% Comp %
Rushing
115 Rush yards4 Rush TD36 Carries3.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume41
  • Dual-Threat70
  • Consistency12
  • Clutch67
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency12th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.31 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.19 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Duke (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1901.19Wk 1 vs Georgia State: +0.94 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs VMI: +0.51 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisville: -0.24 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Duke: +1.19 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs North Carolina: -0.20 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Notre Dame: +0.02 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia Tech: +0.01 EPA/play9Wk 14 vs Georgia: -0.73 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsFlorida StateW24-21-3.211
1vsGeorgia StateW35-12-17.91/1-10091.51500.94
2@SyracuseL28-315.5200.25
3vsVMIW59-73/5581067.72520.51
4@LouisvilleL19-3113.620-0.24
6vsDukeW24-145.6911.19
7@North CarolinaW41-345.01/17005.160-0.20
8vsNotre DameL13-3123.920/362691273.94500.02
9@Virginia TechL6-2110.010/22760123.91000.01
14@GeorgiaL42-4424.300-0.73

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.4%
Passing plays
20.5%
Rushing plays
8.8%
Standard downs
12.3%
Passing downs
19.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.02
Passing downs
0.15
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.00 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.