Skip to content
Xavier Legette
Xavier Legette

#17Xavier Legette

WR·South Carolina·2023

Xavier Legette is a Versatile WR for South Carolina. Xavier's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 98 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Xavier Legette's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
71 Receptions1255 Rec yards7 Rec TD17.7 Yards/rec
Returns
10 Kick returns213 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume36
  • Explosiveness71
  • Consistency76
  • Pass-Down58
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.31 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 3.26 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Mississippi State (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.260−3.26Wk 1 vs North Carolina: +0.77 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Furman: +1.70 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia: +0.49 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Mississippi State: +3.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tennessee: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Florida: +1.52 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Missouri: +2.67 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas A&M: -0.07 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Jacksonville State: +1.53 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Vanderbilt: +0.71 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kentucky: +1.12 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Clemson: +0.24 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNorth CarolinaL17-317.4917819.80370.77
2vsFurmanW47-21—611819.71531.70
3@GeorgiaL14-2431.277110.10350.49
4vsMississippi StateW37-300.5518937.82763.26
5@TennesseeL20-4116.255010.00320.31
7vsFloridaL39-416.8511022.00461.52
8@MissouriL12-3419.312020.00202.67
9@Texas A&ML17-3015.63206.7019-0.07
10vsJacksonville StateW38-28-1.6921724.12651.53
11vsVanderbiltW47-6-12.7912013.30390.71
12vsKentuckyW17-1410.569415.72281.12
13vsClemsonL7-1610.566811.30180.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.7%
Passing plays
20.4%
Rushing plays
2.5%
Standard downs
10.6%
Passing downs
16.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.96
Passing downs
1.01
Pass / Rush EPA
1.09 / -0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.