Skip to content
Ryan Puglisi

#12Ryan Puglisi

Ryan Puglisi is a Volume Passer for Georgia.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ryan Puglisi's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
16/27 Comp/Att161 Pass yards1 Pass TD2 INT59.3% Comp %
Rushing
13 Rush yards0 Rush TD5 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

13
Attempts
13.7y
Avg depth
5.3y
After catch
54%
Catch rate

The ball travels 13.7 yards in the air on an average throw 5.9 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.3 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 27y
1
0% · 0y
1
0% · 0y
short
2
100% · 36y
4
25% · 24y
4
75% · 22y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume20
  • Dual-Threat20
  • Consistency6
  • Clutch0
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency6th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.56 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.56 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Kentucky (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0402.04Wk 1 vs Marshall: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Austin Peay: -0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tennessee: -2.04 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Kentucky: +0.56 EPA/play6Wk 11 vs Mississippi State: -0.37 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Charlotte: -0.17 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMarshallW45-7-4.55/8591084.31300.52
2vsAustin PeayW28-61/24005.0-0.14
3@TennesseeW44-4115.00/10012.3-2.04
6vsKentuckyW35-141.83/4490143.2200.56
11@Mississippi StateW41-214.10/10000.6-0.37
13vsCharlotteW35-3-26.77/1149005.2-20-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.9%
Passing plays
14.4%
Rushing plays
1.5%
Standard downs
5.5%
Passing downs
11.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.07
Passing downs
-1.12
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Ryan Puglisi Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Georgia · Gridpex