#32Ousmane Kromah

RB·Florida State·2025

Ousmane Kromah is a Committee Back for Florida State. Ousmane's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 75 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ousmane Kromah's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

408 Rush yards0 Rush TD72 Carries5.7 Yards/carry

Receiving

9 Receptions147 Rec yards1 Rec TD16.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency3
Volume28
Explosiveness54
Consistency57
Receiving58

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.32 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.05 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs East Texas A&M.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	vsAlabama	W31-17	14.8	7	31	4.4	1	7	0	0.06
2	vsEast Texas A&M	W77-3	—	5	37	7.4	1	43	1	1.05
4	vsKent State	W66-10	-19.3	4	43	10.8	1	9	0	0.74
5	@Virginia	L38-46	11.1	12	63	5.3	—	—	—	0.06
6	vsMiami	L22-28	20.7	6	23	3.8	2	37	0	0.30
7	vsPittsburgh	L31-34	8.4	7	55	7.9	—	—	—	0.30
8	@Stanford	L13-20	-11.8	4	17	4.3	1	31	0	0.36
10	vsWake Forest	W42-7	5.7	4	19	4.8	1	12	0	0.45
11	@Clemson	L10-24	9.5	3	22	7.3	1	5	0	0.25
12	vsVirginia Tech	W34-14	-10.1	11	59	5.4	—	—	—	-0.02
13	@NC State	L11-21	4.8	4	12	3.0	1	3	0	-0.39
14	@Florida	L21-40	3.5	5	27	5.4	—	—	—	-0.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

9.8%

Passing plays

3.1%

Rushing plays

15.0%

Standard downs

12.1%

Passing downs

4.7%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.11
Passing downs: 0.35
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.72 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).