Skip to content
Nyck Harbor

#8Nyck Harbor

Nyck Harbor is a Vertical Threat WR for South Carolina. Nyck's 2025 season produced 45.7 total EPA across 45 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nyck Harbor's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
30 Receptions618 Rec yards6 Rec TD20.6 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns242 KR yards0 KR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

6
Targets
3.0y
Avg depth
11.4y
After catch
83%
Catch rate

The ball travels 3.0 yards in the air on an average target 6.0 yards shorter than the median. Another 11.4 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
2
100% · 28y
0
4
75% · 42y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness91
  • Consistency75
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Vertical Threat WR

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.21 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 4.18 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Alabama (SP+ 15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+4.1804.18Wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: +2.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Carolina State: -0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Vanderbilt: +1.26 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Missouri: +0.72 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kentucky: +2.61 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs LSU: +0.81 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma: +0.81 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Alabama: +4.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Ole Miss: +0.96 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Texas A&M: +1.04 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Clemson: +0.83 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsVirginia TechW24-11-10.139933.01642.48
2vsSouth Carolina StateW38-10-0.30
3vsVanderbiltL7-3120.346616.50261.26
4@MissouriL20-2914.434515.00330.72
5vsKentuckyW35-131.811010.00102.61
7@LSUL10-2010.323618.00200.81
8vsOklahomaL7-2618.34225.51120.81
9vsAlabamaL22-2914.815454.01544.18
10@Ole MissL14-3024.036923.01470.96
12@Texas A&ML30-3120.7310234.01801.04
14vsClemsonL14-289.5611519.21530.83

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.6%
Passing plays
12.6%
Rushing plays
0.6%
Standard downs
5.8%
Passing downs
8.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.41
Passing downs
0.52
Pass / Rush EPA
1.04 / 0.53

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Nyck Harbor Stats, EPA & Player Profile — South Carolina · Gridpex