Skip to content
Nahzae Cox

#0Nahzae Cox

Nahzae Cox is a Versatile WR for Middle Tennessee. Nahzae's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 69 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nahzae Cox's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
40 Receptions473 Rec yards5 Rec TD11.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume30
  • Explosiveness32
  • Consistency56
  • Pass-Down50
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.72 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.54 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Wisconsin (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5401.54Wk 1 vs Austin Peay: +0.49 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Wisconsin: +1.54 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Nevada: +0.52 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Marshall: +0.73 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kennesaw State: +0.37 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Missouri State: -0.46 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Delaware: +0.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Jacksonville State: -0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida International: -0.12 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Sam Houston: +0.68 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsAustin PeayL14-346508.32140.49
2@WisconsinL10-42-4.437525.00371.54
3@NevadaW14-13-13.45459.01140.52
4vsMarshallL28-42-4.569415.71430.73
5@Kennesaw StateL16-24-5.447719.30350.37
7vsMissouri StateL20-22-10.74123.007-0.46
9@DelawareL28-31-10.933712.31280.18
10vsJacksonville StateL21-24-6.74348.5023-0.23
11vsFlorida InternationalL30-56-10.53227.3013-0.12
13vsSam HoustonW31-17-27.822713.50230.68

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.4%
Passing plays
16.5%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
9.2%
Passing downs
13.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.48
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.48 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.