Skip to content
Miles Coleman

#1Miles Coleman

Miles Coleman is a Versatile WR for North Texas. Miles's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 64 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Miles Coleman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
47 Receptions550 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.7 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns16 KR yards0 KR TD10 Punt returns42 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume22
  • Explosiveness31
  • Consistency72
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.46 EPA/play in Wk 15 vs Tulane (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4601.46Wk 1 vs Lamar: +1.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Michigan: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Washington State: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Army: +0.16 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Alabama: +0.39 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs South Florida: +1.04 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Navy: +0.21 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs UAB: +0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Rice: -0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Temple: +0.55 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Tulane: +1.46 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLamarW51-055210.40181.29
2@Western MichiganW33-30-1.42126.00120.29
3vsWashington StateW59-103.844411.00240.27
4@ArmyW45-380.88749.30280.16
5vsSouth AlabamaW36-22-12.74379.30150.39
7vsSouth FloridaL36-6311.6710114.41541.04
10vsNavyW31-176.2122.0020.21
12@UABW53-24-15.822211.00110.18
13@RiceW56-24-14.83258.3015-0.07
14vsTempleW52-25-5.134214.00260.55
15@TulaneL21-346.3712517.91591.46
20vsSan Diego StateW49-476.711414.0014

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.6%
Passing plays
15.6%
Rushing plays
0.5%
Standard downs
6.9%
Passing downs
9.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.45
Passing downs
0.91
Pass / Rush EPA
0.58 / 1.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.