Skip to content
Micah Gilbert

#14Micah Gilbert

Micah Gilbert is a Slot Specialist WR for Notre Dame.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Micah Gilbert's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
9 Receptions93 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume9
  • Explosiveness22
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 2.07 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Miami (SP+ 21).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0702.07Wk 1 vs Miami: +2.07 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Purdue: +0.83 EPA/play4Wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: +0.58 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Syracuse: -0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Stanford: +1.11 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@MiamiL24-2720.72178.51102.07
4vsPurdueW56-30-6.123718.50260.83
12@PittsburghW37-158.4177.0070.58
13vsSyracuseW70-7-13.12105.0010-0.27
14@StanfordW49-20-11.822211.00141.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.0%
Passing plays
6.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
1.6%
Passing downs
6.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.83
Passing downs
1.35
Pass / Rush EPA
1.22 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.