Skip to content
Kevorian Barnes

#2Kevorian Barnes

RB·UTSA·2024

Kevorian Barnes is a Committee Back for UTSA. Kevorian's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 85 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kevorian Barnes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
221 Rush yards2 Rush TD78 Carries2.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions61 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume28
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving24
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency50th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.43 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.38 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Houston Christian.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6700.67Wk 1 vs Kennesaw State: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas State: -0.28 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas: -0.20 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Houston Christian: +0.38 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs East Carolina: -0.00 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Rice: -0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.40 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Tulsa: -0.65 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Memphis: -0.05 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs North Texas: -0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Temple: -0.67 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsKennesaw StateW28-16-25.14225.5011300.20
2@Texas StateL10-495.4540.80-0.28
3@TexasL7-5624.110212.101-40-0.20
4vsHouston ChristianW45-712645.310.38
5@East CarolinaL20-30-1.08324.002360-0.00
7@RiceL27-29-11.4551.00130-0.10
8vsFlorida AtlanticW38-24-12.7362.00110-0.40
9@TulsaL45-46-20.610222.20-0.65
10vsMemphisW44-369.610272.701120-0.05
12vsNorth TexasW48-27-4.510161.61-0.27
13vsTempleW51-27-20.3122.00-0.67

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.7%
Passing plays
1.3%
Rushing plays
19.2%
Standard downs
10.0%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.13
Passing downs
-0.10
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / -0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.