Skip to content
Jordan Johnson

#11Jordan Johnson

Jordan Johnson is a Committee Back for Hawai'i. Jordan's 2023 season produced 5.5 total EPA across 37 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jordan Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
198 Rush yards0 Rush TD34 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions54 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns18 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume31
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving51
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3500.35Wk 2 vs UAlbany: +0.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon: +0.14 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs New Mexico State: +0.35 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UNLV: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs San Diego State: -0.24 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs New Mexico: -0.33 EPA/play8
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsUAlbanyW31-2011766.900.16
3@OregonL10-5526.24399.803700.14
4vsNew Mexico StateW20-17-1.89444.9033500.35
5@UNLVL20-441.47334.701500.22
7vsSan Diego StateL34-41-10.3111.00270-0.24
8@New MexicoL21-42-16.5252.50-0.33

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.7%
Passing plays
3.0%
Rushing plays
28.1%
Standard downs
12.7%
Passing downs
6.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.04
Passing downs
0.60
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.