Skip to content
Jerod Evans

#4Jerod Evans

QB·Virginia Tech·201610.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jerod Evans is a Dual-Threat QB for Virginia Tech. Jerod's 2016 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 585 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jerod Evans's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
268/422 Comp/Att3552 Pass yards29 Pass TD8 INT63.5% Comp %
Rushing
846 Rush yards12 Rush TD204 Carries4.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat78
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs East Carolina (SP+ -9).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs Liberty: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tennessee: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Boston College: +0.61 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs East Carolina: +0.74 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs North Carolina: -0.07 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Syracuse: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Miami: +0.45 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Pittsburgh: +0.37 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Duke: +0.33 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia Tech: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Notre Dame: +0.39 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Virginia: +0.42 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Clemson: +0.18 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Arkansas: +0.27 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsLibertyW36-1320/322214090.74600.41
2vsTennesseeL24-4516.320/282141059.81800.08
3vsBoston CollegeW49-0-1.616/232535188.44800.61
4vsEast CarolinaW54-17-9.013/202823093.99710.74
6@North CarolinaW34-315.97/17752043.3491-0.07
7@SyracuseL17-31-2.720/333072162.06100.29
8vsMiamiW37-1618.621/332592071.29810.45
9@PittsburghW39-3613.124/404062085.03300.37
10@DukeW24-21-2.815/271920076.18310.33
11vsGeorgia TechL20-307.832/453161241.97520.29
12@Notre DameW34-3115.722/292672173.86710.39
13vsVirginiaW52-10-3.816/272532077.93810.42
14vsClemsonL35-4228.721/352641245.14620.18
1vsArkansasW35-247.921/332432147.78720.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
56.7%
Passing plays
94.4%
Rushing plays
28.9%
Standard downs
51.6%
Passing downs
67.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.57
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.29

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.820−0.15
EPA per play · 2016 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.