Skip to content
Jayden McGowan

#15Jayden McGowan

Jayden McGowan is a Versatile WR for Vanderbilt. Jayden's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 59 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden McGowan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
108 Rush yards0 Rush TD19 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
36 Receptions383 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.6 Yards/rec
Returns
19 Kick returns461 KR yards1 KR TD5 Punt returns34 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness24
  • Consistency70
  • Pass-Down91
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.41 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.98 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Missouri (SP+ 19).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9800.98Wk 1 vs Alabama A&M: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Wake Forest: +0.51 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UNLV: +0.40 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Kentucky: +0.69 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Missouri: +0.98 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida: +0.69 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Georgia: +0.57 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Ole Miss: +0.61 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Auburn: -0.13 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Carolina: -0.24 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Tennessee: -0.24 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
0vsHawai'iW35-28-16.467212.0032
1vsAlabama A&MW47-1367011.70230.52
2@Wake ForestL20-36-7.967212.00500.51
3@UNLVL37-401.458116.20390.40
4vsKentuckyL28-4510.50.69
5vsMissouriL21-3819.3177.0070.98
6@FloridaL14-386.8252.5030.69
7vsGeorgiaL20-3731.255811.60200.57
9@Ole MissL7-3318.40.61
10vsAuburnL15-317.64153.806-0.13
11@South CarolinaL6-474.3133.003-0.24
13@TennesseeL24-4816.2-0.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.1%
Passing plays
10.0%
Rushing plays
5.9%
Standard downs
7.2%
Passing downs
9.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.61
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.