Skip to content
Ja'Kyrian Turner
Ja'Kyrian Turner

#25Ja'Kyrian Turner

Ja'Kyrian Turner is a Committee Back for Pittsburgh. Ja'Kyrian's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 154 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ja'Kyrian Turner's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
747 Rush yards7 Rush TD140 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions150 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume59
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving62
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4400.44Wk 2 vs Central Michigan: +0.07 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs West Virginia: -0.37 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Louisville: -0.31 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Boston College: +0.16 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida State: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Syracuse: -0.44 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs NC State: +0.11 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Stanford: +0.13 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Notre Dame: -0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Tech: +0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Miami: -0.05 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsCentral MichiganW45-17-8.86264.311100.07
3@West VirginiaL24-31-6.8492.30130-0.37
5vsLouisvilleL27-3412.46366.00-0.31
6vsBoston CollegeW48-7-8.512675.6123200.16
7@Florida StateW34-317.210444.4243400.34
8@SyracuseW30-13-13.115422.80-0.44
9vsNC StateW53-344.813503.8221300.11
10@StanfordW35-20-11.8221275.8033600.13
12vsNotre DameL15-3724.45153.00-0.26
13@Georgia TechW42-289.3212019.6141200.30
14vsMiamiL7-3820.710373.706110-0.05
20vsEast CarolinaL17-238.016935.80280

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.5%
Passing plays
7.0%
Rushing plays
38.3%
Standard downs
23.4%
Passing downs
14.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
-0.20
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.11 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.