Skip to content
Ja'Cory Thomas

#6Ja'Cory Thomas

Ja'Cory Thomas is a Versatile WR for Old Dominion. Ja'Cory's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 68 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ja'Cory Thomas's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
41 Receptions714 Rec yards5 Rec TD17.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness69
  • Consistency72
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.21 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.52 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Georgia Southern (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5201.52Wk 1 vs Indiana: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina Central: +1.45 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: +0.55 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Liberty: +0.69 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Coastal Carolina: -0.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Marshall: +0.11 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs App State: +1.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UL Monroe: +0.30 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Troy: -0.11 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Southern: +1.52 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia State: +0.64 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@IndianaL14-2732.422412.00150.29
2vsNorth Carolina CentralW54-668614.31271.45
3@Virginia TechW45-26-10.138327.70380.55
5vsLibertyW21-7-9.0511422.82550.69
6vsCoastal CarolinaW47-7-15.133612.0021-0.14
7@MarshallL24-48-4.535418.00470.11
9vsApp StateW24-21-11.466510.81241.18
10@UL MonroeW31-6-21.626532.50530.30
12vsTroyW33-0-4.822713.5119-0.11
13@Georgia SouthernW45-10-9.425125.50281.52
14vsGeorgia StateW27-10-24.546416.00270.64
20vsSouth FloridaW24-1011.634515.0020

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.6%
Passing plays
22.1%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
8.5%
Passing downs
8.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
1.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / 3.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.