Skip to content
Hogan Wasson

#7Hogan Wasson

Hogan Wasson is a Versatile WR for Middle Tennessee.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hogan Wasson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
3 Receptions24 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Punt returns1 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness7
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4800.48Wk 1 vs Murray State: -0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Marshall: -0.48 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMurray StateW38-142115.506-0.14
2@MarshallL26-28-14.411313.0013-0.48

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.7%
Passing plays
10.8%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
8.5%
Passing downs
2.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.26
Passing downs
-1.00
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.35 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.