#9Hank Bachmeier

QB·Louisiana Tech·2023 2021

Hank Bachmeier is a Volume Passer for Louisiana Tech. Hank's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 290 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hank Bachmeier's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing

182/269 Comp/Att2058 Pass yards10 Pass TD5 INT67.7% Comp %

Rushing

47 Rush yards2 Rush TD58 Carries0.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat33
Consistency79
Clutch54

Player type

Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
0	vsFlorida International	W22-17	-21.2	34/44	333	1	1	50.6	-1	0	—
1	@SMU	L14-38	10.1	21/33	241	1	1	15.4	-9	0	0.04
2	vsNorthwestern State	W51-21	—	9/18	110	1	0	29.6	2	0	0.01
3	vsNorth Texas	L37-40	-6.7	6/11	72	2	0	19.8	-3	0	0.34
7	@Middle Tennessee	L23-31	-9.5	16/24	178	1	0	45.9	-14	0	0.27
9	vsNew Mexico State	L24-27	-1.8	20/27	238	1	0	36.5	18	2	0.26
10	@Liberty	L30-56	8.0	23/33	304	2	0	64.4	32	0	0.25
11	vsSam Houston	L27-42	-13.8	29/42	384	0	2	43.6	2	0	0.33
12	@Jacksonville State	L17-56	-1.6	24/37	198	1	1	41.8	20	0	0.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

52.5%

Passing plays

84.5%

Rushing plays

15.2%

Standard downs

47.7%

Passing downs

62.8%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.21
Passing downs: 0.28
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.27 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg

EPA per play · 2021 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.