Skip to content
Dylan Edwards

#1Dylan Edwards

Dylan Edwards is a Pass-Catching Back for Colorado. Dylan's 2023 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 107 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dylan Edwards's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
321 Rush yards1 Rush TD76 Carries4.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
36 Receptions299 Rec yards4 Rec TD8.3 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns96 KR yards0 KR TD2 Punt returns19 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume40
  • Explosiveness24
  • Consistency42
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency42th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.58 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs TCU (SP+ 8).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5801.58Wk 1 vs TCU: +1.58 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nebraska: -0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Colorado State: +0.03 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oregon: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs USC: +0.14 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arizona State: +0.06 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Stanford: +0.18 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs UCLA: -0.02 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Oregon State: -0.03 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arizona: -0.15 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Washington State: +0.44 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Utah: +0.36 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@TCUW45-427.96244.01513531.58
2vsNebraskaW36-140.39556.10380-0.08
3vsColorado StateW43-35-8.910575.7061700.03
4@OregonL6-4226.23217.003900.25
5vsUSCL41-489.412443.700.14
6@Arizona StateW27-24-11.37162.3032400.06
7vsStanfordL43-46-11.97334.7032400.18
9@UCLAL16-289.74123.002120-0.02
10vsOregon StateL19-2612.6561.204220-0.03
11vsArizonaL31-3414.15102.00390-0.15
12@Washington StateL14-564.97426.000.44
13@UtahL17-238.5111.0043910.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.1%
Passing plays
7.9%
Rushing plays
24.7%
Standard downs
14.5%
Passing downs
13.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.21
Pass / Rush EPA
0.52 / 0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.