Skip to content
Demon June

#0Demon June

Demon June is a Committee Back for North Carolina. Demon's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 95 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Demon June's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
464 Rush yards2 Rush TD84 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions159 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume45
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving64
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.87 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8700.87Wk 2 vs Charlotte: +0.12 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Richmond: +0.65 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UCF: -0.09 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Clemson: -0.38 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs California: -0.36 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia: +0.06 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Syracuse: +0.87 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Stanford: -0.48 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wake Forest: +0.11 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Duke: -0.50 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs NC State: -0.34 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2@CharlotteW20-3-26.79525.801000.12
3vsRichmondW41-61414810.6111900.65
4@UCFL9-34-1.210505.00380-0.09
6vsClemsonL10-389.55163.20470-0.38
8@CaliforniaL18-21-3.24102.50-0.36
9vsVirginiaL16-1711.19394.301200.06
10@SyracuseW27-10-13.1131017.8128110.87
11vsStanfordW20-15-11.8341.30-0.48
12@Wake ForestL12-285.79323.6023300.11
13vsDukeL25-326.6691.50390-0.50
14@NC StateL19-424.8231.50-0.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.6%
Passing plays
5.5%
Rushing plays
27.7%
Standard downs
17.1%
Passing downs
12.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.