Skip to content
Christian Hackenberg
Christian Hackenberg

#14Christian Hackenberg

QB·Penn State·20131.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Christian Hackenberg is a Volume Passer for Penn State. Christian's 2013 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 380 plays — a developing rate for the QB. A five-star recruit in the class of 2013, Christian has shown flashes of the talent that made him a coveted recruit.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Christian Hackenberg's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2013

5-Star · Blue chip
Stars
247 composite
0.9927
National rank
#13
High school
Fork Union Military (HS)
Hometown
Fork Union, VA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2013 Production

Passing
231/392 Comp/Att2955 Pass yards20 Pass TD10 INT58.9% Comp %
Rushing
-68 Rush yards4 Rush TD49 Carries-1.4 Yards/carry
Punting
2 Punts85 Punt yards42.5 Yards/punt43 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency68
  • Clutch36
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.70 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Purdue (SP+ -16).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7000.70Wk 1 vs Syracuse: +0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCF: +0.52 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Kent State: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Indiana: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Michigan: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Ohio State: -0.01 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Illinois: +0.32 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Minnesota: +0.03 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Purdue: +0.70 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Nebraska: -0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wisconsin: +0.39 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSyracuseW23-170.022/312782260.9-1200.13
2vsEastern MichiganW45-7-35.723/333111152.1-1600.44
3vsUCFL31-3412.321/282621080.1-300.52
4vsKent StateW34-0-13.813/351761127.9-10-0.01
6@IndianaL24-441.430/553403044.6-1900.12
7vsMichiganW43-4011.123/443053250.8-1610.14
9@Ohio StateL14-6328.412/23112128.5-210-0.01
10vsIllinoisW24-17-4.020/322401082.21010.32
11@MinnesotaL10-242.514/25163009.5-600.03
12vsPurdueW45-21-15.716/232121192.4610.70
13vsNebraskaL20-2311.616/332172147.561-0.10
14@WisconsinW31-2422.421/303394087.1400.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.5%
Passing plays
94.4%
Rushing plays
5.3%
Standard downs
35.9%
Passing downs
69.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
0.21 / -0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.780−0.18
EPA per play · 2013 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.