Skip to content
Bo MacCormack III
Bo MacCormack III

#24Bo MacCormack III

Bo MacCormack III is a Explosive Back for Boston College.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bo MacCormack III's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
43 Rush yards1 Rush TD15 Carries2.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions14 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec
Returns
7 Kick returns124 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency71
  • Receiving55
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.34 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Michigan State (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3401.34Wk 1 vs Fordham: +0.36 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: +1.34 EPA/play2Wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: -0.23 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs UConn: +0.97 EPA/play8
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsFordhamW66-10393.010.36
2@Michigan StateL40-42-3.4100.001.34
6@PittsburghL7-488.49171.90120-0.23
8vsUConnL23-385.12178.5011200.97
11vsSMUL13-4513.4

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.6%
Passing plays
2.0%
Rushing plays
11.9%
Standard downs
7.7%
Passing downs
3.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.93
Pass / Rush EPA
0.99 / 0.33

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.