Skip to content
Bill Jackson

#1Bill Jackson

RB·Tulsa·2024

Bill Jackson is a Pass-Catching Back for Tulsa. Bill's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 79 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bill Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
319 Rush yards0 Rush TD67 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions104 Rec yards2 Rec TD5.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume33
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving84
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.95 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+4.2404.24Wk 1 vs Northwestern State: +0.16 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas State: +0.20 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.06 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs North Texas: +0.05 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Army: +0.02 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Temple: -0.14 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UTSA: -0.11 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UAB: +0.29 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs East Carolina: -0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Florida: -4.24 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorthwestern StateW62-288536.601500.16
2@Arkansas StateL24-28-9.934113.7011500.20
4@Louisiana TechW23-20-11.67365.1031000.06
5@North TexasL20-52-4.516774.801400.05
6vsArmyL7-499.26274.5041500.02
8@TempleL10-20-20.33155.00120-0.14
9vsUTSAW46-452.25132.604311-0.11
10@UABL21-59-11.38344.3021210.29
12vsEast CarolinaL31-38-1.010222.202100-0.07
13@South FloridaL30-63-2.3111.00-4.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.7%
Passing plays
5.4%
Rushing plays
17.6%
Standard downs
13.2%
Passing downs
8.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.01
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / -0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.