#9Anthony Smith

WR·East Carolina·2025

Anthony Smith is a Versatile WR for East Carolina. Anthony's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 84 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Anthony Smith's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

64 Receptions1053 Rec yards7 Rec TD16.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume27
Explosiveness63
Consistency65
Pass-Down71

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency65th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.30 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.06 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Army (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Quadree Henderson	Pittsburgh	2016	63	0.530	1.6	33.4
DeAndre Hughes	Air Force	2021	60	0.470	1.3	28.2
Keytaon Thompson	Mississippi State	2017	70	0.460	1.2	32.2
Savion Williams	TCU	2024	56	0.450	1.1	25.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.	Central Michigan	2022	53	0.460	1.6	24.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	@NC State	L17-24	4.8	6	66	11.0	0	18	0.45
2	vsCampbell	W56-3	—	6	39	6.5	0	9	0.11
3	@Coastal Carolina	W38-0	-15.1	11	136	12.4	0	31	0.55
4	vsBYU	L13-34	15.9	2	24	12.0	0	15	-0.38
5	vsArmy	W28-6	0.8	3	87	29.0	1	41	2.06
7	@Tulane	L19-26	6.3	2	54	27.0	0	49	-0.24
8	vsTulsa	W41-27	-10.0	4	150	37.5	2	66	1.88
10	@Temple	W45-14	-5.1	2	58	29.0	0	35	1.71
11	vsCharlotte	W48-22	-26.7	8	69	8.6	1	14	0.54
12	vsMemphis	W31-27	7.6	7	62	8.9	0	18	0.59
13	@UTSA	L24-58	3.7	8	143	17.9	1	50	0.74
14	@Florida Atlantic	W42-3	-8.7	1	9	9.0	0	9	0.04
20	vsPittsburgh	W23-17	8.4	4	156	39.0	2	72	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

9.6%

Passing plays

21.1%

Rushing plays

0.4%

Standard downs

9.9%

Passing downs

8.8%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.68
Passing downs: 0.81
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.68 / 3.48

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).