Skip to content
Aneyas Williams

#22Aneyas Williams

Aneyas Williams is a Explosive Back for Notre Dame.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aneyas Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
224 Rush yards5 Rush TD24 Carries9.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions40 Rec yards0 Rec TD20.0 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns19 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume24
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency78
  • Receiving35
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.76 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.31 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3101.31Wk 4 vs Purdue: -0.36 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Arkansas: +1.07 EPA/play5Wk 11 vs Navy: +1.23 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Syracuse: +1.31 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Stanford: +0.82 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
3vsTexas A&ML40-4120.7
4vsPurdueW56-30-6.14102.50-0.36
5@ArkansasW56-135.122010.011.07
11vsNavyW49-106.257214.411.23
13vsSyracuseW70-7-13.133913.011.31
14@StanfordW49-20-11.810838.3224000.82

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.3%
Passing plays
1.6%
Rushing plays
13.3%
Standard downs
9.4%
Passing downs
5.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.69
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / 0.64

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Aneyas Williams Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Notre Dame · Gridpex