Skip to content

Which is the best college football conference in 2015?

Analysis

Every FBS team is a dot. Conference averages are not shown, and that is the point: the SEC’s mean is dragged up by four teams, the Big Ten’s spread is twice the Sun Belt’s, and a bar chart of means says none of it. What “compare the conferences” actually asks is how much of one league sits inside the other.

Third down conversion · 2015

FBS medianFBS IndependentsAmerican Athlet…Big 12Pac-12Conference USABig TenACCSECMid-AmericanMountain WestSun Belt

One dot per team, one tick per conference median. Leagues are ordered by median, and the mean is deliberately not shown — four teams drag it and it hides how far the two distributions overlap.

ConferenceTeamsMedianSpreadBest
FBS Independents343.4%6.0%Army 46.8%
American Athletic1243.0%13.0%Cincinnati 52.9%
Big 121042.5%5.2%Texas Tech 52.5%
Pac-121241.2%8.1%Stanford 50.3%
Conference USA1340.7%8.6%Rice 50.6%
Big Ten1440.6%6.4%Michigan State 49.0%
ACC1439.5%8.2%North Carolina 50.9%
SEC1439.3%6.0%Arkansas 47.8%
Mid-American1339.2%6.7%Bowling Green 51.3%
Mountain West1238.9%7.7%San José State 48.9%
Sun Belt1137.6%6.7%Georgia State 45.0%

Two numbers, not one

Median answers “how good is this league”. Spread — the interquartile range — answers “how evenly good”, and it is usually the more interesting of the two. A league with a high median and a huge spread is four contenders and eight teams padding their records, which is exactly the shape that produces a conference champion who keeps losing in January.

Note which metric you are looking at. CORE is opponent-adjusted, so it can be compared across leagues honestly. The raw metrics cannot: a conference that plays itself twelve times has its schedule strength baked into every raw number, which is the single most common way conference comparisons go wrong.