Skip to content

Which is the best college football conference in 2017?

Analysis

Every FBS team is a dot. Conference averages are not shown, and that is the point: the SEC’s mean is dragged up by four teams, the Big Ten’s spread is twice the Sun Belt’s, and a bar chart of means says none of it. What “compare the conferences” actually asks is how much of one league sits inside the other.

Offense success rate · 2017

FBS medianPac-12SECBig 12ACCMountain WestAmerican Athlet…Conference USAFBS IndependentsSun BeltMid-AmericanBig Ten

One dot per team, one tick per conference median. Leagues are ordered by median, and the mean is deliberately not shown — four teams drag it and it hides how far the two distributions overlap.

ConferenceTeamsMedianSpreadBest
Pac-121245.3%3.4%Washington 48.6%
SEC1443.9%5.5%Alabama 48.4%
Big 121043.1%6.1%Oklahoma 53.3%
ACC1442.9%4.1%Louisville 49.9%
Mountain West1242.8%6.1%Colorado State 49.1%
American Athletic1242.8%4.9%UCF 49.3%
Conference USA1442.1%6.4%North Texas 47.4%
FBS Independents441.9%10.6%Army 51.7%
Sun Belt1241.5%4.8%Arkansas State 46.1%
Mid-American1240.8%5.1%Ohio 48.5%
Big Ten1440.1%5.7%Ohio State 52.1%

Two numbers, not one

Median answers “how good is this league”. Spread — the interquartile range — answers “how evenly good”, and it is usually the more interesting of the two. A league with a high median and a huge spread is four contenders and eight teams padding their records, which is exactly the shape that produces a conference champion who keeps losing in January.

Note which metric you are looking at. CORE is opponent-adjusted, so it can be compared across leagues honestly. The raw metrics cannot: a conference that plays itself twelve times has its schedule strength baked into every raw number, which is the single most common way conference comparisons go wrong.