Incarnate Word vs. Abilene Christian: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Incarnate Word0-1
▸
Abilene Christian
Final
Wildcat Stadium (TX)
INCATeam statsABIL
517Total yards320
373Pass189
144Rush131
20First downs19
5-143rd down5-14
1Turnovers1
28:01Possession31:59
- Q4 2:45ABILKyle Ramsey 44 Yd Field Goal 27–20
- Q4 5:18INCAMason Lawler 27 Yd Field Goal 27–17
- Q4 8:26ABILJay'Veon Sunday 1 Yd Run (Kyle Ramsey Kick)24–17
- Q4 10:06INCAZach Calzada 1 Yd Run (Mason Lawler Kick)24–10
- Q4 14:50INCABrandon Porter 23 Yd pass from Zach Calzada (Mason Lawler Kick)17–10
- Q2 0:00INCAMason Lawler 43 Yd Field Goal 10–10
- Q2 0:31ABILKyle Ramsey 51 Yd Field Goal 7–10
- Q2 3:29INCAZach Calzada 52 Yd Run (Mason Lawler Kick)7–7
- Q2 4:16ABILJermiah Dobbins 29 Yd Run (Kyle Ramsey Kick)0–7
What the numbers say
- ABIL played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and INCA did not face the same ones. 3rd & 8.9 vs 3rd & 5.4
Kickoff130 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
ABIL (top)INCA (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: ABIL 0%
Incarnate Word
- PassZach Calzada 23/36, 373 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
- RushZach Calzada 7 CAR, 66 YDS, 2 TD
- RecBrandon Porter 10 REC, 201 YDS, 1 TD
Abilene Christian
- PassMaverick McIvor 15/32, 189 YDS, 1 INT
- RushJermiah Dobbins 21 CAR, 106 YDS, 1 TD
- RecCooper McCasland 4 REC, 64 YDS
26sper snap · in line with the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
115
Points / snap
0.41
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsTied entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,328 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
50%
ABIL win rate
How often the home team won from here
FAQ
What was the final score of Incarnate Word vs. Abilene Christian?
Incarnate Word 27, Abilene Christian 20.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
No — the model picked ABIL, which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
INCA
ABIL
41%
Success rate
34%
0.32
EPA / pass
-0.12
0.26
EPA / rush
-0.13
41%
Early-down success
35%
41%
Pass success
33%
40%
Rush success
34%
19%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
7%
20%
Stuffed rush rate
34%
66%
Pass rate
38%
5.4
Avg 3rd-down distance
8.9
INCA
5.4 yards to go on 3rd down
59 scrimmage snaps
ABIL
8.9 yards to go on 3rd down
56 scrimmage snaps
| INCA | ABIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 517 | Total yards | 320 |
| 373 | Passing yards | 189 |
| 144 | Rushing yards | 131 |
| 20 | First downs | 19 |
| 5-14 | 3rd down | 5-14 |
| 1-2 | 4th down | 0-1 |
| 23/36 | Comp/Att | 15/32 |
| 10.4 | Yards per pass | 5.9 |
| 4.6 | Yards per rush | 3.7 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 9-76 | Penalties | 5-50 |
| 28:01 | Possession | 31:59 |
INCA
5/6 with the model
−1.1 pts · −0.0% win prob
ABIL
8/9 with the model
−0.3 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q1 4:33 INCA punt on 4th & 1 at INCA 12. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 1.10 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishINCA 4/11 scoring drives← own end zone →ABIL 2/10 scoring drives
ABILDOWNS15 pl, 72 yds· own 25Q1
INCAPUNT3 pl, 9 yds· own 3Q1
ABILPUNT3 pl, 1 yds· own 47Q1
INCAPUNT5 pl, 17 yds· own 18Q1
ABILPUNT3 pl, -7 yds· own 18Q1
INCADOWNS5 pl, 19 yds· own 39Q2
ABILINT4 pl, 11 yds· own 37Q2
INCAINT7 pl, 56 yds· own 30Q2
ABILTD8 pl, 80 yds· own 20Q2
INCATD4 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q2
ABILFG5 pl, 39 yds· own 27Q2
INCAFG3 pl, 49 yds· own 25Q2
INCAPUNT6 pl, 24 yds· own 25Q3
ABILPUNT6 pl, 13 yds· own 25Q3
INCAPUNT3 pl, 1 yds· own 12Q3
ABILPUNT3 pl, 1 yds· own 48Q3
INCAPUNT7 pl, 35 yds· own 20Q3
ABILPUNT3 pl, 8 yds· own 6Q3
INCATD5 pl, 64 yds· own 36Q3
ABILPUNT3 pl, 0 yds· own 25Q4
INCATD8 pl, 70 yds· own 30Q4
- Q4 2:45ABILKyle Ramsey 44 Yd Field Goal 27–20
- Q4 5:18INCAMason Lawler 27 Yd Field Goal 27–17
- Q4 8:26ABILJay'Veon Sunday 1 Yd Run (Kyle Ramsey Kick)24–17
- Q4 10:06INCAZach Calzada 1 Yd Run (Mason Lawler Kick)24–10
- Q4 14:50INCABrandon Porter 23 Yd pass from Zach Calzada (Mason Lawler Kick)17–10
- Q2 0:00INCAMason Lawler 43 Yd Field Goal 10–10
- Q2 0:31ABILKyle Ramsey 51 Yd Field Goal 7–10
- Q2 3:29INCAZach Calzada 52 Yd Run (Mason Lawler Kick)7–7
- Q2 4:16ABILJermiah Dobbins 29 Yd Run (Kyle Ramsey Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
































