Skip to content
Jaylin Carter

#6Jaylin Carter

Jaylin Carter is a Explosive Back for Memphis. Jaylin's 2026 season produced 22.0 total EPA across 44 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaylin Carter's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
280 Rush yards5 Rush TD34 Carries8.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions18 Rec yards0 Rec TD18.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume71
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving21
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.75 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Arkansas State (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7500.75Wk 1 vs Arkansas State: +0.75 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boise State: +0.49 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0@UNLVW27-212.315976.51
1vsArkansas StateW42-24-15.1191839.6411800.75
2@Boise StateL20-385.299510.6111300.49

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.9%
Passing plays
2.9%
Rushing plays
40.8%
Standard downs
31.0%
Passing downs
9.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.45
Passing downs
0.87
Pass / Rush EPA
2.32 / 0.41

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.