Skip to content

Utah State

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

Mountain West · 26-7 · AdjEM +15.6, 50 of 362 nationally.

2023-24 seasonthrough ratings as of 2024-04-0824 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2024-04-08

Every team →
AdjEM
+15.650 of 362
AdjO
113.632 of 362
AdjD
98.077 of 362
AdjT
72.164 of 362

Utah State went from +14.5 (#47) on 2023-11-05 to +15.6 (#50) on 2024-04-08, peaking at +18.4 (#31) on 2024-01-15.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2023-11-052024-04-08

Four factorsraw season rates · 33 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
54.0%43
TOV%
14.8%91
OREB%
26.0%200
FTA/FGA
39.0%34
Opp eFG%
49.8%135
Opp TOV%
15.1%244
DREB%
75.7%67
Opp FTA/FGA
30.6%126

Résumé26-7 · against the ratings of 2024-04-08

Schedule strength
+7.486 of 362
Non-conference
+6.147 of 362
Luck
+12.3%8 of 362
Wins above bubble
+3.517 of 362
Quad 1
4-6
Quad 2
5-1
Quad 3
10-0
Quad 4
7-0

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players9 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →
PlayerGMPGPPGRPGAPGeFG%TS%USG%3P%FT%
Darius Brown IIG3536.012.34.36.554.0%57.4%—39.8%86.5%
Great OsoborF3533.717.79.02.858.1%60.4%—21.4%63.7%
Ian MartinezG3430.913.33.61.856.1%62.0%—38.1%85.6%
Mason FalslevG3428.011.34.42.460.7%61.4%—30.5%64.2%
Jacob ConnerF3326.56.15.12.844.6%46.5%—32.7%62.5%
Isaac JohnsonC3514.96.63.10.854.7%57.9%—34.2%84.6%
Karson TemplinF237.62.51.70.359.2%61.1%—20.0%65.0%
Landon BrenchleyG132.90.70.80.442.9%41.7%—0.0%37.5%
Jackson GrantF56.02.21.20.237.5%50.7%——83.3%

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games26-7

“Ours” is our projected margin for Utah State, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentQuadResultOurs
11-11@BradleyQ1#62L 66-72-3.1
11-14vsSouthern UtahQ4#238W 93-84+16.5
11-19nMarshallQ4#226W 83-60+7.2
11-20nAkronQ3#114W 65-62+3.7
11-21nStephen F. AustinQ3#169W 79-49+3.2
11-28@Saint LouisQ3#180W 81-76+8.2
12-02vsUC IrvineQ3#78W 79-69+8.9
12-06vsSan DiegoQ4#245W 108-81+20.0
12-13@Santa ClaraQ2#101W 84-82+4.5
12-16nSan FranciscoQ2#53W 54-53+2.4
12-22vsEast Tennessee StateQ4#210W 80-65+21.0
01-02@Air ForceQ3#217W 88-60+7.6
01-06vsColorado StateQ2#47W 77-72+3.8
01-09vsWyomingQ3#160W 83-59+18.4
01-13@UNLVQ1#74W 87-86+2.9
01-16@New MexicoQ1#31L 86-99-2.3
01-20vsFresno StateQ4#197W 83-62+19.0
01-27@Boise StateQ1#32W 90-84-2.5
01-30vsSan José StateQ4#215W 82-61+16.4
02-03@San Diego StateQ1#24L 67-81-5.1
02-06vsNevadaQ2#38L 63-77+5.5
02-10vsBoise StateQ2#32W 80-61+3.9
02-14@WyomingQ3#160W 84-76+9.4
02-17@Colorado StateQ1#47L 55-75-2.7
02-20vsSan Diego StateQ1#24W 68-63+0.1
02-27@Fresno StateQ3#197W 77-73+9.8
03-01vsAir ForceQ4#217W 72-60+17.3
03-06@San José StateQ3#215W 90-70+10.6
03-09vsNew MexicoQ2#31W 87-85+2.8
03-14nFresno StateQ3#197W 87-75+13.9
03-15nSan Diego StateQ1#24L 70-86-2.4
03-22nTCUQ1#35W 88-72-1.7
03-24nPurdueQ1#3L 67-106-11.3

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 362 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.