Skip to content

Samford

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

SoCon · 18-10 · AdjEM +3.7, 126 of 363 nationally.

2022-23 seasonthrough ratings as of 2023-04-0323 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2023-04-03

Every team →
AdjEM
+3.7126 of 363
AdjO
106.493 of 363
AdjD
102.7188 of 363
AdjT
71.088 of 363

Samford went from +1.1 (#154) on 2022-11-06 to +3.7 (#126) on 2023-04-03, peaking at +5.9 (#109) on 2022-12-05.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2022-11-062023-04-03

Four factorsraw season rates · 28 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
53.6%39
TOV%
16.9%172
OREB%
26.1%197
FTA/FGA
41.0%12
Opp eFG%
51.9%260
Opp TOV%
18.5%84
DREB%
75.4%97
Opp FTA/FGA
37.6%310

Résumé18-10 · against the ratings of 2023-04-03

Schedule strength
-2.9237 of 363
Non-conference
-2.3265 of 363
Luck
+1.1%145 of 363
Wins above bubble
-4.9115 of 363
Quad 1
0-1
Quad 2
1-3
Quad 3
6-5
Quad 4
11-1

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players20 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →
PlayerGMPGPPGRPGAPGeFG%TS%USG%3P%FT%
Bubba ParhamG3229.69.63.22.652.4%57.4%17.1%39.0%79.1%
Jermaine MarshallF3124.913.36.51.154.5%60.7%25.7%37.5%79.5%
Logan DyeF3224.113.35.11.257.0%59.7%28.1%39.4%68.9%
AJ Staton-McCrayG3122.08.24.10.651.6%56.0%18.8%28.9%76.7%
Jaron RillieG3220.74.82.22.558.9%63.1%11.9%37.7%75.5%
Nathan JohnsonF3219.64.82.80.648.0%49.7%14.3%29.9%54.2%
Jaden CampbellG3019.97.72.30.349.5%52.6%20.6%33.6%83.8%
Ques GloverG1924.614.72.52.152.3%58.5%30.6%37.8%84.7%
Achor AchorF3014.46.13.50.659.3%61.0%20.9%33.3%64.9%
Quinn RicheyG179.11.70.60.542.0%50.3%10.0%30.4%100.0%
Cooper KaifesG815.52.62.51.143.2%44.8%11.9%27.8%66.7%
Brody BoyerG167.62.10.80.651.8%52.7%14.7%35.0%57.1%
Britton JohnsonG134.11.81.00.267.6%67.6%19.0%45.5%—
Daniel LobachF113.91.10.60.460.0%60.0%12.9%0.0%—
Marcellus VailG93.00.40.10.133.3%33.3%14.9%0.0%—
Grayson WaltersF41.30.00.00.0——0.0%——
Owen LaRoccaG31.70.00.30.00.0%0.0%20.1%0.0%—
Clay HolmesG31.00.00.00.00.0%0.0%16.8%0.0%—
Charlie MorrisonG31.00.01.00.00.0%0.0%33.6%0.0%—
Joshua HughesF31.00.00.00.0——0.0%——

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games18-10

“Ours” is our projected margin for Samford, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentQuadResultOurs
11-17@Alabama A&MQ4#316W 84-64+5.8
11-20vsTexas SouthernQ4#299W 78-63+5.6
11-23vsValparaisoQ4#278W 79-49+13.4
11-25vsLouisiana TechQ3#147L 76-79+2.5
11-30@DePaulQ3#143L 98-103-4.4
12-04@UCFQ1#53L 77-80-7.0
12-10@LouisianaQ2#104L 58-75-3.9
12-17@South Carolina StateQ4#349L 61-62+8.0
12-21@BelmontQ2#98L 56-79-5.2
12-28vsMercerQ4#194W 78-69+3.4
12-31@The CitadelQ4#323W 75-63+2.7
01-04vsVMIQ4#346W 87-78+14.2
01-07@UNC GreensboroQ2#108W 70-68-4.2
01-11vsWoffordQ4#221W 83-58+6.7
01-14vsChattanoogaQ3#151W 75-74+2.0
01-18@East Tennessee StateQ3#233W 69-59+3.6
01-21vsWestern CarolinaQ4#234W 74-65+10.9
01-25@FurmanQ2#85L 84-91-6.3
01-28@WoffordQ3#221L 77-85+1.6
02-01@Western CarolinaQ3#234W 85-77+3.0
02-04vsEast Tennessee StateQ4#233W 73-62+9.9
02-08@MercerQ3#194W 70-69+0.3
02-11vsThe CitadelQ4#323W 76-70+14.8
02-15vsUNC GreensboroQ3#108W 83-71+1.3
02-18@VMIQ4#346W 96-61+8.3
02-22@ChattanoogaQ3#151W 75-70-2.2
02-25vsFurmanQ3#85L 79-93-0.2
03-04nChattanoogaQ3#151L 82-85+2.1

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 363 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.