Arizona

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

Big 12 · 24-13 · AdjEM +29.4, 8 of 364 nationally.

2024-25 seasonthrough ratings as of 2025-04-0724 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2025-04-07

Every team →

AdjEM: +29.48 of 364
AdjO: 122.011 of 364
AdjD: 92.518 of 364
AdjT: 72.540 of 364

Arizona went from +28.4 (#7) on 2024-11-03 to +29.4 (#8) on 2025-04-07, peaking at +31.7 (#4) on 2024-11-11.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2024-11-032025-04-07

Four factorsraw season rates · 37 complete games

Leaderboards →

eFG%: 53.3%74
TOV%: 15.4%144
OREB%: 34.8%16
FTA/FGA: 35.8%90
Opp eFG%: 48.9%85
Opp TOV%: 15.0%250
DREB%: 74.8%61
Opp FTA/FGA: 29.8%92

Résumé24-13 · against the ratings of 2025-04-07

Schedule strength: +17.56 of 364
Non-conference: +9.922 of 364
Luck: -5.9%300 of 364
Wins above bubble: +5.714 of 364

Quad 1: 10-12
Quad 2: 5-1
Quad 3: 5-0
Quad 4: 4-0

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players20 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →

Player	G	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	eFG%	TS%	USG%	3P%	FT%
Jaden BradleyG	37	34.1	12.1	3.4	3.7	50.4%	56.0%	18.0%	32.1%	82.7%
Caleb LoveG	37	34.0	17.2	4.4	3.4	48.9%	53.4%	25.9%	34.0%	88.9%
KJ LewisG	37	25.9	10.8	4.6	2.9	45.0%	52.5%	23.2%	18.8%	80.7%
Henri VeesaarC	37	20.8	9.4	5.0	1.3	62.8%	64.6%	19.6%	32.7%	68.6%
Trey TownsendF	35	21.0	8.2	3.9	1.0	53.2%	57.1%	19.2%	33.3%	79.4%
Tobe AwakaF	37	19.5	8.0	7.8	0.7	65.2%	66.1%	17.1%	40.0%	66.7%
Carter BryantF	37	19.3	6.5	4.1	1.0	57.1%	59.3%	16.4%	37.1%	69.5%
Anthony Dell'OrsoG	37	18.2	7.2	1.4	1.4	57.5%	60.8%	17.7%	41.3%	90.2%
Motiejus KrivasC	8	15.9	7.9	4.5	1.1	55.3%	60.3%	22.3%	—	70.0%
Conrad MartinezG	22	5.1	1.6	0.3	1.0	80.6%	82.6%	12.1%	50.0%	87.5%
Liam LloydG	14	2.0	0.2	0.4	0.1	0.0%	13.8%	18.9%	0.0%	75.0%
Emmanuel StephenC	8	2.9	1.3	1.3	0.1	100.0%	77.8%	17.8%	—	0.0%
Grant WeitmanG	12	1.8	0.8	0.6	0.0	83.3%	83.3%	15.5%	66.7%	—
Addison ArnoldG	11	1.4	0.3	0.3	0.0	25.0%	30.3%	22.5%	0.0%	50.0%
Luke ChampionF	9	1.6	0.0	0.2	0.0	0.0%	0.0%	10.4%	0.0%	—
Will MenaughF	11	1.1	0.2	0.2	0.0	50.0%	50.0%	12.1%	—	—
Will KuykendallG	3	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	—	16.2%	—	—
Jackson FrancoisG	2	1.0	0.0	0.5	0.0	—	—	0.0%	—	—
Jackson CookG	2	1.0	0.0	0.5	0.0	—	—	0.0%	—	—
Sven DjopmoG	2	1.0	1.0	0.5	0.0	50.0%	50.0%	72.9%	—	—

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games24-13

“Ours” is our projected margin for Arizona, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

Date	Opponent	Quad	Result	Ours	Pace	Snapshot
11-04	vsCanisius	Q4#357	W 93-64	+32.0	72	11-03
11-09	vsOld Dominion	Q4#308	W 102-44	+31.9	73	11-04
11-15	@Wisconsin	Q1#19	L 88-103	+6.5	72	11-11
11-22	vsDuke	Q1#1	L 55-69	-1.1	73	11-18
11-27	nDavidson	Q3#141	W 104-71	+15.8	73	11-25
11-28	nOklahoma	Q1#43	L 77-82	+6.4	73	11-25
11-29	nWest Virginia	Q2#51	L 76-83	+9.8	73	11-25
12-07	vsSouthern Utah	Q4#293	W 102-66	+23.7	73	12-02
12-14	nUCLA	Q1#20	L 54-57	+0.3	72	12-09
12-18	vsSamford	Q3#122	W 96-64	+15.8	75	12-16
12-21	vsCentral Michigan	Q4#228	W 94-41	+24.3	73	12-16
12-30	vsTCU	Q3#80	W 90-81	+13.1	73	12-23
01-04	@Cincinnati	Q1#39	W 72-67	-2.9	71	12-30
01-07	@West Virginia	Q1#51	W 75-56	+3.3	72	01-06
01-11	vsUCF	Q2#65	W 88-80	+17.1	74	01-06
01-14	vsBaylor	Q1#25	W 81-70	+4.6	71	01-13
01-18	@Texas Tech	Q1#9	L 54-70	-2.5	71	01-13
01-21	@Oklahoma State	Q2#94	W 92-78	+13.1	73	01-20
01-25	vsColorado	Q2#74	W 78-63	+16.0	72	01-20
01-27	vsIowa State	Q1#10	W 86-75	+1.3	72	01-20
02-01	@Arizona State	Q2#78	W 81-72	+8.1	72	01-27
02-04	@BYU	Q1#21	W 85-74	+1.3	72	02-03
02-08	vsTexas Tech	Q1#9	W 82-73	+3.2	71	02-03
02-11	@Kansas State	Q1#71	L 70-73	+8.4	71	02-10
02-15	vsHouston	Q1#2	L 58-62	-3.3	69	02-10
02-17	@Baylor	Q1#25	W 74-67	+0.2	71	02-10
02-22	vsBYU	Q1#21	L 95-96	+8.6	72	02-17
02-26	vsUtah	Q2#66	W 83-66	+14.0	72	02-24
03-01	@Iowa State	Q1#10	L 67-84	-3.4	72	02-24
03-04	vsArizona State	Q3#78	W 113-100	+14.9	72	03-03
03-08	@Kansas	Q1#16	L 76-83	-1.9	72	03-03
03-13	nKansas	Q1#16	W 88-77	+0.9	72	03-10
03-14	nTexas Tech	Q1#9	W 86-80	-1.3	71	03-10
03-15	nHouston	Q1#2	L 64-72	-7.2	69	03-10
03-21	nAkron	Q3#112	W 93-65	+17.0	72	03-17
03-23	nOregon	Q1#31	W 87-83	+6.0	71	03-17
03-27	nDuke	Q1#1	L 93-100	-8.2	70	03-24

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.