Southern Utah

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

UAC · 9-19 · AdjEM -11.9, 293 of 364 nationally.

2024-25 seasonthrough ratings as of 2025-04-0724 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2025-04-07

Every team →

AdjEM: -11.9293 of 364
AdjO: 96.1324 of 364
AdjD: 108.0235 of 364
AdjT: 70.7115 of 364

Southern Utah went from -7.0 (#251) on 2024-11-03 to -11.9 (#293) on 2025-04-07, peaking at -3.0 (#199) on 2024-11-25.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2024-11-032025-04-07

Four factorsraw season rates · 28 complete games

Leaderboards →

eFG%: 46.8%331
TOV%: 20.1%357
OREB%: 27.8%178
FTA/FGA: 36.2%80
Opp eFG%: 49.9%120
Opp TOV%: 14.3%307
DREB%: 69.6%297
Opp FTA/FGA: 33.0%178

Résumé9-19 · against the ratings of 2025-04-07

Schedule strength: -2.0181 of 364
Non-conference: -0.5213 of 364
Luck: +1.8%151 of 364
Wins above bubble: -14.8279 of 364

Quad 1: 0-2
Quad 2: 0-3
Quad 3: 1-7
Quad 4: 8-7

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players18 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →

Player	G	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	eFG%	TS%	USG%	3P%	FT%
Jamir SimpsonG	31	32.0	16.1	4.7	1.8	46.3%	52.6%	27.9%	33.9%	80.0%
Brock FelderF	31	23.2	5.8	6.2	1.0	59.4%	60.6%	12.7%	0.0%	65.1%
Dominique FordG	25	26.9	14.5	2.8	1.4	50.3%	55.3%	26.8%	32.0%	89.6%
Tavi JacksonG	19	27.6	10.1	3.5	2.9	51.0%	54.3%	21.6%	28.8%	66.2%
Jamari SibleyF	21	24.3	6.3	4.4	1.1	44.0%	46.4%	15.4%	32.7%	72.7%
Jeffrey Langston Jr.F	31	15.8	6.5	3.8	0.6	45.9%	51.5%	23.9%	15.4%	70.7%
Lorenzo AbellarG	30	15.2	2.6	1.5	2.2	35.1%	39.3%	15.0%	33.3%	65.4%
Hercy MillerG	26	17.0	7.2	2.8	1.0	45.2%	53.3%	24.9%	33.3%	76.5%
Robert JeterPG	28	11.2	1.0	0.4	0.5	32.5%	34.2%	8.5%	25.0%	100.0%
Malik LaminC	30	10.4	1.7	2.2	0.2	75.0%	65.2%	8.6%	—	20.0%
Duncan ReidSG	26	8.2	2.2	0.8	0.3	40.2%	40.7%	16.9%	30.0%	50.0%
Kai BurdickC	23	8.8	2.3	3.1	0.3	53.3%	51.3%	15.8%	—	37.5%
Xavier SykesG	25	8.0	3.1	0.8	0.6	44.0%	46.6%	24.7%	30.8%	68.8%
Cade BrazierG	11	5.2	3.2	0.6	0.2	51.8%	55.0%	29.3%	38.9%	75.0%
Mason JohnsonF	5	7.4	2.8	2.4	0.0	40.0%	43.9%	22.6%	0.0%	100.0%
Tainui TaiaroaPG	4	7.0	1.3	2.0	0.5	37.5%	42.4%	10.4%	25.0%	50.0%
Shawn MitchellG	2	8.0	3.5	1.5	1.5	50.0%	50.7%	24.4%	33.3%	50.0%
Peter Dadson Jr.G	5	2.4	0.8	0.6	0.0	66.7%	66.7%	12.3%	—	—

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games9-19

“Ours” is our projected margin for Southern Utah, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

Date	Opponent	Quad	Result	Ours	Pace	Snapshot
11-09	vsFlorida International	Q4#266	W 80-75	+5.2	72	11-04
11-16	vsOmaha	Q4#181	W 79-73	+1.2	72	11-11
11-19	@Loyola Chicago	Q2#110	L 72-76	-14.2	72	11-18
11-22	@San Diego	Q4#301	W 72-67	-2.1	73	11-18
11-23	nIdaho	Q4#276	W 82-67	+3.5	71	11-18
11-26	@UCLA	Q1#20	L 43-88	-20.4	70	11-25
11-30	vsCal State Bakersfield	Q4#255	W 74-64	+6.5	70	11-25
12-07	@Arizona	Q1#8	L 66-102	-23.7	73	12-02
12-16	@New Mexico State	Q3#162	L 69-72	-2.6	71	12-09
12-18	@UT Rio Grande Valley	Q4#297	L 73-78	+1.7	72	12-16
12-21	vsNorthern Arizona	Q4#271	L 75-83	+9.2	71	12-16
01-04	@Grand Canyon	Q2#92	L 71-82	-15.5	72	12-30
01-09	vsTarleton State	Q4#272	L 66-74	+6.0	69	01-06
01-11	vsUT Arlington	Q4#213	W 73-68	-0.1	72	01-06
01-18	@Seattle U	Q3#145	L 52-75	-8.5	70	01-13
01-23	vsGrand Canyon	Q3#92	L 59-74	-9.1	72	01-20
01-25	vsCalifornia Baptist	Q4#175	L 60-76	-0.5	70	01-20
01-30	@UT Arlington	Q3#213	L 68-70	-7.7	71	01-27
02-01	@Tarleton State	Q4#272	L 58-75	-2.9	69	01-27
02-06	@California Baptist	Q3#175	W 60-57	-8.6	69	02-03
02-08	vsAbilene Christian	Q4#239	L 70-84	+3.7	70	02-03
02-13	vsUtah Tech	Q4#289	W 76-74	+4.6	70	02-10
02-15	vsUtah Valley	Q3#116	L 68-70	-5.9	70	02-10
02-20	@Abilene Christian	Q3#239	L 59-75	-4.9	70	02-17
02-27	@Utah Tech	Q4#289	W 82-75	-2.6	70	02-24
03-01	@Utah Valley	Q2#116	L 59-100	-12.1	70	02-24
03-06	vsSeattle U	Q3#145	L 39-62	-5.4	70	03-03
03-11	nUtah Tech	Q4#289	L 65-72	-0.1	70	03-10

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.