Skip to content

South Alabama Jaguars

Sun Belt·1-1·
Elo
1390#92
SP+
-11.4#106
FPI
-9.6
AP
NR
Nextvs Ohio · Wk 3Win prob 38%Model +4.6
Talent #107 (573.4)Recruiting class #7779% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on South Alabama

All news

South Alabama's coverage is the worst draw Tulane could have

Matchup · 6d ago

South Alabama routs SE Louisiana, 39-14

Matchup · Sep 6

Roster · 116 players

FR 32SO 17JR 22SR 45
#PlayerPosClHtWt
4Bishop DavenportQBSR6'2"210
7Jared HollinsQBJR6'4"210
15Taylor Jacobs Jr.QBFR5'11"195
16Aaden ShamburgerQBFR6'2"180
18Jerry HorneQBSO6'0"200
0PJ MartinRBSR5'10"205
3Keenan PhillipsRBJR5'10"185
17Anthony JefferyRBSO5'8"190
20Lavonte ColeRBFR5'11"195
21Trae'von DunbarRBJR5'10"205
22Caleb WynnRBFR5'9"205
24Julyon JordanRBSO5'9"180
26Donovan CrowRBFR5'11"215
1Anthony EagerWRSR6'1"185
2Jeremiah Jones-ThomasWRSO5'11"180
6Micah WoodsWRSR6'0"190
8Noah TosterWRSR6'4"200
10Khatori MarionWRFR5'11"180
11Trae StevensonWRSO5'11"190
12Brendan JenkinsWRSR6'0"195
13Jarvis Washington Jr.WRFR6'4"190
19Jerrian GrahamWRJR6'1"200
23Dominic WhiteWRFR6'1"190
27Tylen CampbellWRSR5'10"185
81Miguel CamboiaWRSR5'9"175
85Brian BarnesWRJR6'1"215
89Brandon NolanWRFR5'10"170
9Rod GibbsTESR6'4"250
14Maddox LynchTESO6'5"240
34Cam McFarlinTEJR6'4"240
82Julius MathisTEFR6'4"230
83Everett HunterTESR6'4"250
84Nate ForystekTESR6'5"260
87Jordan MorrisTESR6'4"230
88Owen CarlsonTESO6'2"230
51Diego CamboiaOLSR6'5"265
52Andre WoodsOLJR6'3"330
56Naol AndargeOLJR6'5"300
57Shalik HubbardOLSR6'4"330
58Cam'Ron ThompsonOLFR6'3"330
60Devon WallerOLSR6'3"290
61Julius KiddOLSR6'2"260
62Kyle GreakOLFR6'2"293
64Jamal SilerOLJR6'4"310
66Devin WhiteOLSO6'2"280
67Artem Korchagin Jr.OLFR6'4"300
68Reese Osei-WusuOLSR6'4"310
69Kenton JeridoOLSR6'3"340
70Elliott ChaneyOLFR6'5"290
71Jaylen BookerOLJR6'5"305
72Ethan HubbardOLSR6'6"295
73Jamal ScottOLFR5'11"230
74Aydan NewellOLFR6'3"315
77Kearius BivensOLSO6'5"295
79Eric MahanOLFR6'3"402
9Emmanuel WallerDLSR6'3"275
18Mase LewisDLSR6'3"275
39Rodney HunterDLJR6'2"305
41Tyler CarterDLJR6'4"290
49Tre BrownDLSR6'3"295
56Stephen JohnsonDLSR6'3"310
75Tyler WileyDLFR6'3"275
80Brayden HurstDLFR6'3"310
85Andrew WashburnDLSR6'2"270
90E'Mauri SmileyDLSO6'1"265
93Jeremiah WaldrondDLSR6'2"275
94Andrew HinesDLSO6'3"285
0Parker ShattuckLBJR6'1"220
6Kaydon DegraffenreidLBSR6'0"225
10William Felton IVLBJR6'1"225
16Seidrion LangstonLBSR6'1"220
17Christian RossLBSR6'2"235
20Tirrell JohnsonLBSR6'2"230
22Caleb DozierLBJR6'2"220
25Tre'Mon HenryLBSR6'1"235
26Xavious Anderson Jr.LBFR6'0"225
27Zechariah HallLBFR6'1"230
30Perry HandLBFR5'11"200
33Tyray DarensburgLBFR5'11"225
42Dylan ChiedoLBSR6'0"230
43Jacob PorcoLBJR6'1"210
44Donnie ArnoldLBSO5'11"235
45Demetress MosleyLBFR6'2"195
46Terry Kirksey Jr.LBSR6'2"245
48Jordan WilliamsLBSR6'2"230
53Latrelle LettLBSO5'8"235
3Tre Webb IIICBSR6'0"190
7Deuce VanceCBSO6'0"180
12Jaylen MosonCBSR5'11"175
15Colby WilliamsCBSR6'0"185
19TJ CollierCBFR6'0"180
23Cube GurleyCBJR6'1"195
24Damyrion DarbyCBJR5'11"180
34Bradley ThomasCBSR5'11"175
37Evan JonesCBFR6'0"175
1D.J. MooreSSR6'0"200
2Jayvon HendersonSSR5'10"190
4Kohl BradleySSO6'0"190
8Dallas YoungSSR6'0"205
13Kam RobinsonSSR5'11"185
14Cole BlaylockSSR6'0"190
21Deon CallinsSFR5'10"190
28Tomareo Johnson Jr.SFR6'2"200
29Kaleb JacksonSSR5'8"180
31Dashaun CaffeeSJR5'7"165
32Camen UpshawSFR6'0"200
35Matthew LaseterSSO6'0"180
36Teryn GreenSFR6'0"215
38Braiden CheshireSFR5'10"175
35Davis LittlePKJR6'0"175
37Dylan FreeburyPKSO5'10"180
38Peyton ArgentPKJR6'0"195
98Christopher AikmanPKFR5'11"150
40Aleksi PulkkinenPSR6'4"215
44Baxter TurnerLSSR5'11"200
47Grant RountreeLSJR6'1"215

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
31.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
21.0
scoring defense
Differential
+10.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
436.5#50
Yards / play
5.5#99
Passing yards / game
225.0#71
Rushing yards / game
211.5#36
First downs / game
26.0#20
3rd down %
51.5%#31
4th down %
33.3%#99
Time of possession
38:55#1
Defense
Yards allowed / game
327.5#72
Yards / play allowed
7.4#133
Pass yards allowed / game
199.0#65
Rush yards allowed / game
128.5#81
3rd down % allowed
31.6%#48
Sacks
2#106
Tackles for loss
8#104
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+2#24
Takeaways
2#76
Giveaways
0#1
Penalties / game
5.5#37
Penalty yards / game
46.5#48

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2 games in

balanced

South Alabama is in year 3 under Major Applewhite, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are offensive, led by 28th at staying out of the backfield. The way in is 137th at keeping everything in front of them, and they are 128th at defending the pass.

On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+3.4%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −17.3% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

South Alabama has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 22% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Strengths

  • Offensegetting stopped at the line
    13.8%
    #28 of 138

Soft spots

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    1.85
    #137 of 138
  • Defensethrowing it
    +0.56
    #128 of 138
  • Defenserunning it
    +0.11
    #105 of 138

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
5.26.8
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
4.2
of 10 games
Bowl odds
40%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
74%
vs UL Monroe
Toughest
16%
vs Marshall

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 5-7 (27%)Bowl eligible 40% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBBishop Davenport
+33.5 EPA
WRAnthony Eager, Micah Woods +3
+18.7 EPA
RBTrae'von Dunbar, PJ Martin +1
+6.1 EPA
TERod Gibbs
+1.1 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +33.50.435/play77 snaps
RBPJ Martin
~$149K
EPA +1.70.044/play38 snaps
EPA -1.3-0.047/play27 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.2456th#61
Def0.327th#129
Explosiveness
Off1.2545th#77
Def1.851st#136
Field position
Off71.569th#44
Def71.558th#58
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.1553rd#65
Def3.3050th#70
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 0
Margin +2

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.4164th#50
Off · rush
0.1758th#59

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.1758th#58
Def0.1138th#86
Passing
Off0.4164th#50
Def0.567th#128

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.16#59
2nd-level / open-field
0.99 / 0.49
Power / stuff (off)
76.9% / 13.8%
Havoc — total (def)
22.5%#22
Havoc — front 7 / DB
12.4% / 10.1%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.12
Def0.18
Pass downs
Off0.47
Def0.57

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.06#810.16#830.81#31
Defense0.05#960.58#1310.59#101

Elo Trajectory

SE LouisianaFinal
Elo rating 13901391+1 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.2561st
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.297th
  • Offense success rate44%47th
  • Defense success rate allowed39%46th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs48%45th
  • Offense success — passing downs36%67th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs43%53rd
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs30%38th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.246th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.72nd
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.041st
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.833rd

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.374th
  • Defense line yards allowed1.793rd
  • Offense highlight yards0.6025th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed2.92nd
  • Offense power success0.7858th
  • Defense power success allowed0.4680th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1374th
  • Defense stuff rate0.3195th

Third down

  • Third down conversion53%80th
  • Third down distance faced6.853rd
  • Third down conversion allowed33%66th
  • Third down distance forced8.487th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.0443rd
  • Net success rate — second half0.0338th

Drives

  • Points per drive2.764th
  • Points per drive allowed2.833rd
  • Average starting field position225th
  • Opponent starting field position2857th
  • Available yards gained62%77th
  • Available yards allowed55%40th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive89%70th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed90%29th
  • Points per scoring opportunity3.062nd
  • Points allowed per opportunity3.140th
  • Three-and-out rate0%99th
  • Three-and-outs forced20%41st

Roster

  • Returning usage76%90th
  • Returning EPA18170th
  • Team talent composite57323rd
  • Recruiting class rank77.045th
  • Recruiting class points18745th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.236#61 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.409#50
Rush EPA/play
+0.170#58
Explosiveness
1.245#77
Pts/opportunity
4.15#65
Success rate
42.5%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.239 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

High-pressure defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.319#129 · bottom 20%
Havoc rate (total)
22.5%#22
Front-7 havoc
12.4%
DB havoc
10.1%
Big play rate allowed
1.854#136
Success rate allowed
36.9%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

31.5 PPG offense, 21.0 allowed — +10.5 margin/game
Points per game
31.5
Points allowed/game
21.0
Scoring margin/game
+10.5
Turnover margin
+2won 2 · lost 0
Production returning
79%
Talent rank (247)
#107

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE56thEXPLOSIVENESS45thFINISHING53thFIELD POS69thDEFENSE7thHAVOC85th50th100th
Offense
56th
Explosiveness
45th
Finishing
53th
Field Pos
69th
Defense
7th
Havoc
85th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-4.1
#86
Offense
+8.1
#25
Defense
+12.2
#135
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 9 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive2.672.80
Starting field positionown 21.8own 27.5
Available yards61.7%54.9%
Scoring opportunities88.9%90.0%
Points per opportunity3.003.11
Three-and-out rate0.0%20.0%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
44.9%
Expected, given the spots
51.6%
Over expected
-6.7
Fourth down vs peers
+4
Fourth down vs the model
+25
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. South Alabama is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to South Alabama in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Florida StateSP+ +6.9
Off EPA/play +0.242Def EPA/play +0.268Elo 1557
Match
97%
Arkansas StateSP+ -15.1
Off EPA/play +0.192Def EPA/play +0.279Elo 1353
Match
96%
CharlotteSP+ -26.0
Off EPA/play +0.209Def EPA/play +0.375Elo 1182
Match
96%
Oregon StateSP+ -6.8
Off EPA/play +0.232Def EPA/play +0.253Elo 1260
Match
96%
Texas StateSP+ -7.8
Off EPA/play +0.174Def EPA/play +0.326Elo 1441
Match
96%
StanfordSP+ -4.7
Off EPA/play +0.278Def EPA/play +0.244Elo 1354
Match
95%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -18.2, #110 of 1282016: -15.6, #109 of 1282017: -20.7, #120 of 1302018: -18.8, #116 of 1302019: -17.2, #115 of 1302020: -11.1, #97 of 1242021: -10.4, #98 of 1302022: +0.8, #64 of 1312023: +11.0, #30 of 1332024: +5.8, #46 of 1342025: -14.2, #104 of 1362026: -4.1, #86 of 138
20152026
Now -4.1 · #86 of 138Best +11.0 in 2023Worst -20.7 in 2017

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.4-0.4
20254-83-5
33%
5.0-1.0
20247-65-3
54%
7.9-0.9
20237-64-4
54%
7.8-0.8
202210-37-1
77%
10.3-0.3
20215-72-6
42%
6.7-1.7
20204-73-5
36%
3.9+0.1
20192-101-7
17%
2.9-0.9
20183-92-6
25%
2.9+0.1
20174-83-5
33%
3.6+0.4

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.2%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 6.0-6.2. Wins the Sun Belt in 4.7%.

If they finish with…

38%
1 loss
2.8%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

Win out and it is 38%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

up 0.0 points since preseason.

  • At 1 loss they are 38% where the average Sun Belt team is 36%.
  • The Sun Belt takes 0.20 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.2% of seasons, having won their league in 99% of those.

South Alabama’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4at Kentucky1.0
  • wk10at Louisiana0.6
  • wk9vs Louisiana Tech0.5
  • wk6at Arkansas State0.4
  • wk8at Marshall0.4
  • wk11vs Troy0.4

Who to root for

Games South Alabama is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk4Virginia over Delaware0.2
  • wk11Sacramento State over Central Michigan0.2
  • wk3Sam Houston over Nicholls0.2
  • wk11Kent State over Bowling Green0.1
  • wk6LSU over Kentucky0.1
  • wk5UTEP over New Mexico0.1
The full playoff picture →

Sun Belt

West division · 0-0 in league play, projected 4.2-3.88 of 14 by title odds
4.7%
Wins the Sun Belt
13%
Reaches the title game

The Sun Belt keeps divisions (East and West) and sends the winner of each — so South Alabama can finish with the league’s second-best record and still stay home. The last berth is level on percentage in 46% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk10South Alabama at Louisiana10.7
  • wk9Louisiana Tech at South Alabama8.7
  • wk6South Alabama at Arkansas State7.8
  • wk11Troy at South Alabama7.0

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Sun Belt race →

If not the playoff, then

57%
Bowl eligible
56%
Placed in a bowl
0.2%
In the playoff
44%
Season over in November

South Alabama is 1-1 and needs 5 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • New Orleans Bowl8.4%
  • Salute to Veterans Bowl7.5%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl7.4%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl7.0%
  • Frisco Bowl6.8%
  • Cure Bowl6.1%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 9 have sent South Alabama a player since 2010 — 27 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of South Alabama's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
McGill ToolenAL81
HooverAL40
OxfordAL30
Pleasant GroveUT30
Hapeville CharterGA21
CallawayGA20
John CurtisLA20
Pine ForestFL20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.