South Alabama vs. Tulane: Final Score & Recap

0%

-38

1%

-32

1%

-24

3%

-18

7%

-10

11%

-4

15%

+4

17%

+10

16%

+18

13%

+24

8%

+32

5%

+38

2%

+46

South Alabama winsTulane wins

Market: Tulane −10Projected: Tulane by 11 (78%)

The range of outcomes for this game. Each bar is how often the final margin lands in that range — the more it leans toward Tulane, the more likely Tulane wins.

GRIDPEX.COM

Both openers pointed the same direction, and it wasn't Tulane's

South Alabama scored 39.0 on SE Louisiana and gained 36.1 yards per drive; Tulane gained 17.8 and scored on 8.3% of its twelve possessions. SE Louisiana is not Duke, and the 10.2 still leans on the preseason baseline more than on either opener. But the team laying double digits is the one whose offense stalled, and South Alabama is the one that scored on 63.6% of its drives.

The throw Tulane needs is the throw that isn't there

The widest mismatch here is Tulane's passing game against South Alabama's pass defense, and the explosive-pass version of it is nearly as wide. What South Alabama removes is the escape hatch, the one throw that turns second-and-long into a scoring chance. Strip that and Tulane is left grinding out first downs, the exact thing Tulane could not do at Duke, where twelve possessions produced 17.8 yards apiece.

◄South AlabamafavorsTulane►

Passing gameTulane offense vs South Alabama defenseSouth Alabama — big edge

Explosive passingTulane offense vs South Alabama defenseSouth Alabama — big edge

Short-yardage / powerSouth Alabama offense vs Tulane defenseSouth Alabama — clear edge

Run gameTulane offense vs South Alabama defenseSouth Alabama — clear edge

Big plays (overall)Tulane offense vs South Alabama defenseSouth Alabama — clear edge

Each unit matchup this season, sorted by how decisive it is — the top bar is what most tilts the game. Bars toward Tulane are battles it should win; toward South Alabama are ones South Alabama wins.

GRIDPEX.COM

Zycarl Lewis Jr. projects for 13 to 41 receiving yards, Garrett Mmahat for 20 to 33, complementary-piece bands rather than the ranges a passing game carries a team with. Tulane's defense was not the problem at Duke; it allowed 17 points on the road. The half of Tulane that failed a week ago is the half South Alabama is best equipped to attack again.

Last season's two-point game reads better than either opener

Tulane won 33-31 at South Alabama last season, on the road, by a margin one snap could have reversed. That 33-31 is the cleanest read anyone has on how these two rosters fit together, and it does not describe a ten-point gap. It also describes a South Alabama team that went 4-8 while scoring 26.5 a game and still took an 11-3 team to the final possession.

Tulane hosts this time, worth real points, while South Alabama returns more of last season's production than Tulane does; those two pull against each other. Tulane is still the better roster, and the projection has it winning 33-22 with a 78% chance of the outright win. The thing worth holding onto is that the last time these rosters shared a field, Tulane's edge came to two points.

◄South AlabamafavorsTulane►

Last season's body of worklast year's power rating, regressed toward the averageTulane +7

Returning productionhow much of last year's production is back this seasonSouth Alabama +5

Roster talentoverall talent level of the roster — recruiting pedigree plus an independent preseason roster gradeTulane +4

Quarterbackthe projected starter's quality and how settled the job isSouth Alabama +1

Each ingredient of our projection and the side it favors — bars toward Tulane are why it's the pick (home field is counted separately).

GRIDPEX.COM

Tulane has no ground route around it either

South Alabama ranks 14th of 185 in what it gives up on the ground, and Jamauri McClure's projected 33 to 94 rushing yards is a band wide enough to hold a useful afternoon and a nonfactor alike. Maurice Turner projects for 9 to 25. An offense that cannot throw over South Alabama and cannot lean on the run is left converting third downs, and Tulane went three-and-out on 41.7% of its drives at Duke.

South Alabama gave up 14.0 points in its opener, and that number and the 14th-ranked run defense describe the same unit: one that makes an offense earn early-down yards, then meets it on second-and-8 with the coverage edge intact. The failure mode South Alabama forces is the one Tulane already produced at Duke, which makes this the least forgiving Saturday available to an offense still looking for itself.

South Alabama's Short-yardage edge is how it keeps the ball

The one place South Alabama's offense grades clearly ahead of Tulane's defense is short-yardage power, and that edge is worth more than its size suggests. For South Alabama it is the difference between a punt and a fresh set of downs, and it sits behind the 9.1% three-and-out rate from last week. Every extra drive South Alabama keeps is one fewer possession Tulane gets to solve the coverage.

Bishop Davenport projects for 121 to 190 passing yards with a 59% chance of throwing a touchdown, which is not a quarterback asked to win a game by himself against a Tulane pass defense that grades 69th of 185, respectable rather than a wall. Keenan Phillips projects for 33 to 65 rushing yards, PJ Martin for 22 to 55, Anthony Eager 12 to 39 receiving, Brendan Jenkins 12 to 30. South Alabama spreads the volume and hides the single point of failure.

Tulane grades below South Alabama in passing, explosive passing, the run and big plays overall. Big plays are what govern the cover: Tulane gets from a lead to a 10.2-point margin on short fields and chunk gains, and neither comes cheaply against South Alabama. That is how a 33-22 projection turns into a one-score fourth quarter without anything dramatic having gone wrong along the way.

South Alabama's cover is the slow, clean afternoon

South Alabama's route to the number is the low-event game: drives that end in punts, no free points, no short fields handed over. That even-turnover script shows up in 77% of projected outcomes, and Tulane clears ten points in only 53% of them. Winning is the strong expectation for Tulane at 78%; covering 10.2 is a different question, and the distance between those two is most of the story here.

Tulane needs a passing game it hasn't shown

Tulane needs the intermediate throws to exist against the defense best built to erase them, and the 33-22 projection assumes an offense nearer last season's 27.7 a game than the one that scored three at Duke. South Alabama needs its short-yardage edge to turn into long possessions again and the afternoon to stay slow; the under sits at just 32%, the less likely version of the game, but the version that gets South Alabama to the number.