Skip to content
Tyjae Spears

#22Tyjae Spears

RB·Tulane·202220215.7 pts line value1st Round

Tyjae Spears is a 2-year Featured Back for Tulane. Tyjae's 2022 season ranks in the 93th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 244 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tyjae Spears's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1581 Rush yards19 Rush TD229 Carries6.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions256 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency93
  • Volume74
  • Explosiveness78
  • Consistency70
  • Receiving43
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)93th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.34 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.02 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs USC (SP+ 19).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
DeWayne McBrideUAB0.4205.8101.6
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Najee HarrisAlabama0.4405.9121.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0201.02Wk 1 vs Massachusetts: +0.72 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Alcorn State: -0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kansas State: +0.05 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Southern Miss: +0.46 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Houston: +0.30 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs East Carolina: -0.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs South Florida: +0.44 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Memphis: +0.25 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Tulsa: +0.65 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UCF: +0.97 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs SMU: +0.64 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Cincinnati: +0.18 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UCF: +0.17 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs USC: +1.02 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMassachusettsW42-10-30.312574.8323200.72
2vsAlcorn StateW52-0581.60-0.32
3@Kansas StateW17-1021.49262.910.05
4vsSouthern MissL24-27-3.5221145.2257400.46
5@HoustonW27-244.514543.9068510.30
6vsEast CarolinaW24-91.116533.30240-0.15
7@South FloridaW45-31-17.0181518.420.44
8vsMemphisW38-286.8241255.211800.25
10@TulsaW27-13-6.11415711.211600.65
11vsUCFL31-3810.3813016.301900.97
12vsSMUW59-244.7131219.321510.64
13@CincinnatiW27-2413.1351815.2211700.18
14vsUCFW45-2810.3221999.011200.17
1vsUSCW46-4518.91720512.1411401.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.0%
Passing plays
6.2%
Rushing plays
41.3%
Standard downs
27.7%
Passing downs
22.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.69 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+2.880−0.732022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Tulane
3.2
57.2
2022Tulane
5.7
105.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.