Skip to content
Najee Harris

#22Najee Harris

RB·Alabama·202020195.9 pts line value1st Round

Najee Harris is a 2-year Featured Back for Alabama. Najee's 2020 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 292 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Najee Harris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
1466 Rush yards26 Rush TD251 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
43 Receptions425 Rec yards4 Rec TD9.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume97
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency84
  • Receiving68
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (88th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 0.51 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Tennessee (SP+ 1).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Cameron SkatteboArizona State0.4106.2126.7
Tyler AllgeierBYU0.4406.3119.2
Jeremy LangfordMichigan State0.4006.4118.8
Bijan RobinsonTexas0.3905.9107.6
Bryce LoveStanford0.4606.7130.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5100.51Wk 4 vs Missouri: +0.39 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Texas A&M: +0.34 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ole Miss: +0.43 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Georgia: +0.11 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee: +0.51 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Mississippi State: +0.01 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Kentucky: +0.38 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Auburn: +0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs LSU: +0.23 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Arkansas: -0.02 EPA/play15Wk 16 vs Florida: +0.30 EPA/play16Wk 1 vs Notre Dame: +0.37 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Ohio State: +0.37 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
4@MissouriW38-19-1.017985.832800.39
5vsTexas A&MW52-2416.212433.6222600.34
6@Ole MissW63-484.8232069.0534200.43
7vsGeorgiaW41-2419.1311524.9111000.11
8@TennesseeW48-170.920964.8366100.51
9vsMississippi StateW41-0-1.4211195.7063600.01
12vsKentuckyW63-32.213836.4222700.38
13vsAuburnW42-1312.611968.7123400.30
14@LSUW55-176.0211456.932300.23
15@ArkansasW52-31.614463.32120-0.02
16vsFloridaW52-4619.8311785.7256730.30
1vsNotre DameW31-1421.0151258.3043000.37
1vsOhio StateW52-2428.422793.6277910.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.1%
Passing plays
12.7%
Rushing plays
54.9%
Standard downs
37.2%
Passing downs
24.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.750−0.232020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Alabama
3.7
77.0
2020Alabama
5.9
121.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.