Skip to content
Trey Ragas

#9Trey Ragas

RB·Louisiana·202020182.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Trey Ragas is a 2-year Explosive Back for Louisiana. Trey's 2020 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 142 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Trey Ragas's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
760 Rush yards10 Rush TD131 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions106 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.8 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns46 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume56
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency77
  • Receiving39
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Texas State (SP+ -13).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5900.59Wk 2 vs Iowa State: +0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia State: +0.30 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia Southern: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.11 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UAB: -0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas State: +0.59 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas State: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Alabama: +0.49 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs UL Monroe: +0.56 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs App State: +0.47 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs UTSA: +0.30 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2@Iowa StateW31-1413.314493.510.13
3@Georgia StateW34-31-5.78445.510.30
4vsGeorgia SouthernW20-180.215523.5145400.27
7vsCoastal CarolinaL27-306.610777.700.11
8@UABW24-206.36183.00-0.18
9@Texas StateW44-34-13.4191316.931800.59
10vsArkansas StateW27-20-6.512756.301800.17
11vsSouth AlabamaW38-10-11.310787.8012510.49
13@UL MonroeW70-20-18.411958.611300.56
14@App StateW24-2110.312433.621810.47
1vsUTSAW31-24-9.614987.010.30

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.6%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
31.1%
Standard downs
22.3%
Passing downs
13.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.33
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.93 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.110−0.302020
EPA per play · 2018 — 2020 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Louisiana
2.3
60.3
2020Louisiana
2.8
53.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.