Skip to content

Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns

Sun Belt·1-1·
Elo
1389#93
SP+
-5.7#85
FPI
-6.7
AP
NR
Nextvs UAB · Wk 3Win prob 51%Model -0.3
Talent #99 (590.9)Recruiting class #9192% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Louisiana

All news

Louisiana can throw on USC, but not push

Matchup · 6d ago

D'Wayne' Winfield produced eight of Louisiana's eleven explosive plays

Matchup · Sep 6

Roster · 105 players

FR 47SO 21JR 23SR 14
#PlayerPosClHtWt
3Coleman CarterQBFR6'1"205
7Lunch WinfieldQBJR6'2"225
11Daniel BealeQBSO6'2"206
13Alex MunozQBFR5'10"195
16Sam AltmannQBSO6'3"208
0Darrell SmithRBFR5'8"200
20JJ GarnerRBFR5'10"210
21Ke'Rynn SmithRBFR5'7"173
22Anthony Reagan Jr.RBJR5'9"185
24Steven BlancoRBSO5'9"215
29Owen MorrisRBFR5'9"170
2Rahji DennisWRSO5'10"175
4Trenton ChaneyWRFR5'9"178
6Shelton Sampson Jr.WRJR6'4"206
8Jaydon JohnsonWRSR6'2"235
9KeDarius WadeWRJR6'4"200
10Russell BabineauxWRFR5'9"178
15Ja'Corian NorrisWRSO6'2"200
17Landon StrotherWRSO6'1"197
80Jayden LewisWRFR6'4"185
85Landon BaptisteWRJR6'4"180
87Kristion BrooksWRFR6'2"176
18Khristian MackintrushTEFR6'2"231
43Aiden FalgoutTEFR6'1"235
44Teddy GawlikTESO6'2"230
46Emiliano SoldevillaTEJR6'3"246
82Quandre CoatesTEFR6'4"257
83Brock ChappellTESR6'5"252
86Jerry BirdlowTEFR6'3"225
88Caden JensenTEJR6'6"265
50Cooper FordhamOLJR6'2"295
52Ryder BentleyOLSO6'6"300
53Gunnar GoodwinOLFR6'4"296
55Baylynn WilliamsOLFR6'5"318
57Zay AlexanderOLSO6'7"322
58Trey ShawOLFR6'3"310
59Andrew MartinezOLJR6'3"306
60Jackson HammondOLSO6'0"300
61Jayce MitchellOLSO6'3"322
65Xzavier BrownOLJR6'6"320
66Colin HarringtonOLFR6'7"275
67Jayden MichaelOLFR6'4"327
69Jai'Vale Mays-HudsonOLFR6'4"300
71George JacksonOLSR6'5"315
72J'Marion GoochOLJR6'7"308
73Jayden McAllisterOLFR6'4"297
74Drake PerryOLFR6'1"325
75Kaden MoreauOLSR6'4"305
76Matthew BroussardOLJR6'4"313
77Jakoby IsomOLSO6'1"318
78Michael Bowens Jr.OLFR6'5"318
79David BakerOLFR6'4"379
9Lance WilliamsDEJR6'3"233
17Tito ChikereDESR6'3"247
41Chase EdwardsDEJR6'7"295
0Priest AsheDLSO6'4"235
31Ty DominiqueDLFR6'2"225
68Fitzgerald West Jr.DLSR6'2"300
91Jordan PinnockDLFR6'3"236
93Brodrick StewartDLJR6'1"305
95Maxie Baudoin IVDLSR6'5"300
96Chase HowardDLFR6'3"260
97Xavier WatersDLFR6'1"315
98Jeramiah HoltsDLSO6'5"245
99Ashton WrightDLSO6'4"298
2Ashley WilliamsLBJR6'5"260
3Micah JohnsonLBJR6'0"232
4Princeton MalbrueLBSR6'1"225
6Conor McPhersonLBSO6'2"219
7Ethan VealLBSO6'0"215
15Na'Tori BrownLBSO6'5"248
16Kailep EdwardsLBSR6'0"220
33AJ SpencerLBFR6'4"205
36Devin FranklinLBFR6'5"210
37Harrison KidderLBFR6'0"198
44Jake St. AndreLBSR6'0"220
45Patrick GossleeLBFR6'1"210
51Hayden DarbonneLBJR6'1"235
80Lester JonesLBJR6'3"235
10Avery DemeryCBSO6'2"195
11Brent Gordon Jr.CBSO5'11"200
13Curley Reed IIICBJR6'1"200
18Cam RileyCBFR5'11"170
20Braylon WalkerCBFR5'9"170
22Kevin MaloneCBFR5'9"172
23Jeremiah MosesCBJR6'0"186
30Julius HarperCBFR6'1"175
47Maurice Brown Jr.CBFR6'0"173
25Jayden GlostonDBFR5'11"190
8Kody JacksonSJR6'1"200
19Luke GreenSFR6'1"172
21Maurion EleamSSR5'10"180
24Lake BatesSSO5'11"190
26Kerry WilsonSJR6'0"200
27Edrick WilliamsSFR6'0"170
28Steven Ranel IISFR6'1"205
34Jayden ReedSFR5'11"180
35Collin JacobSSR6'0"180
46Roderick BinghamSFR5'11"161
25Brek SchultzPKFR5'8"185
40Logan KlotzPKSR6'1"200
95Tony SternerPKSR6'0"197
49Mason GoldingPFR6'2"180
48Jackson VillaumeLSFR5'9"225
54Carson KraftLSFR6'2"218

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
34.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
28.0
scoring defense
Differential
+6.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
416.0#63
Yards / play
6.9#33
Passing yards / game
221.5#75
Rushing yards / game
194.5#46
First downs / game
21.0#65
3rd down %
33.3%#104
4th down %
50.0%#70
Time of possession
30:12#74
Defense
Yards allowed / game
344.0#81
Yards / play allowed
5.3#77
Pass yards allowed / game
209.0#70
Rush yards allowed / game
135.0#88
3rd down % allowed
64.3%#138
Sacks
3#80
Tackles for loss
8#104
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+2#24
Takeaways
5#9
Giveaways
3#74
Penalties / game
6.0#46
Penalty yards / game
54.0#63

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

Louisiana is in year 6 under Michael Desormeaux, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are defensive, led by 30th at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 128th at holding the line of scrimmage, and they are 127th on early downs defensively.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+2.9%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −23.1% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Louisiana has played 1 game against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #30
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensethe push the line gets
    #128
    projected
  • Defensefirst and second down
    #127
    projected
  • Defensemoving the ball on the ground
    #122
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
6.95.1
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
5.9
of 10 games
Bowl odds
83%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
82%
vs Coastal Carolina
Toughest
30%
vs Southern Miss

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 26% chance
Likeliest finish 7-5 (26%)Bowl eligible 83% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBD'Wayne' Winfield, Daniel Beale
+24.2 EPA
TEBrock Chappell, Caden Jensen +1
+10.5 EPA
WRJaydon Johnson, Kedarius Wade +4
+8.0 EPA
RBSteven Blanco, Darrell Smith +2
+4.4 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +26.00.455/play57 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.2558th#58
Def0.2118th#113
Explosiveness
Off1.4991st#14
Def1.1963rd#52
Field position
Off68.739th#85
Def74.329th#98
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off3.8841st#82
Def5.254th#132
Turnovers
Won 5Lost 3
Margin +2

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.3758th#59
Off · rush
0.4089th#16

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.4089th#16
Def0.0647th#74
Passing
Off0.3758th#59
Def0.577th#129

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.12#66
2nd-level / open-field
1.33 / 1.76
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 16.7%
Havoc — total (def)
13.1%#117
Havoc — front 7 / DB
7.3% / 5.8%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.08
Def-0.03
Pass downs
Off0.52
Def0.81

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.07#760.81#30.21#119
Defense-0.19#310.34#1090.88#128

Elo Trajectory

LamarFinal
Elo rating 13891387-2 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.3171st
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.1333rd
  • Offense success rate48%66th
  • Defense success rate allowed45%12th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs51%59th
  • Offense success — passing downs45%88th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs48%25th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs39%12th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.476th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.169th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.9836th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.276th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.154th
  • Defense line yards allowed2.745th
  • Offense highlight yards1.772nd
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.5066th
  • Offense power success0.8880th
  • Defense power success allowed0.6361st
  • Offense stuff rate0.1938th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2364th

Third down

  • Third down conversion33%21st
  • Third down distance faced7.526th
  • Third down conversion allowed59%1st
  • Third down distance forced6.110th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.0325th
  • Net success rate — second half0.0445th

Drives

  • Points per drive2.458th
  • Points per drive allowed4.74th
  • Average starting field position2738th
  • Opponent starting field position3041st
  • Available yards gained47%45th
  • Available yards allowed78%4th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive70%29th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed78%58th
  • Points per scoring opportunity4.488th
  • Points allowed per opportunity6.02nd
  • Three-and-out rate40%16th
  • Three-and-outs forced0%7th

Roster

  • Returning usage66%77th
  • Returning EPA18976th
  • Team talent composite59128th
  • Recruiting class rank91.034th
  • Recruiting class points18034th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.249#58 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.375#59
Rush EPA/play
+0.399#16
Explosiveness
1.495#14
Pts/opportunity
3.88#82
Success rate
42.6%

Near-equal efficiency edge: 0.025 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disciplined defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.208#113 · bottom 20%
Havoc rate (total)
13.1%#117
Front-7 havoc
7.3%
DB havoc
5.8%
Big play rate allowed
1.186#52
Success rate allowed
47.1%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

Points per game
34.0
Points allowed/game
28.0
Scoring margin/game
+6.0
Turnover margin
+2won 5 · lost 3
Production returning
92%
Talent rank (247)
#99

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE58thEXPLOSIVENESS91thFINISHING41thFIELD POS39thDEFENSE18thHAVOC15th50th100th
Offense
58th
Explosiveness
91th
Finishing
41th
Field Pos
39th
Defense
18th
Havoc
15th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+4.5
#54
Offense
+5.2
#38
Defense
+0.7
#77
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 10 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive2.404.67
Starting field positionown 27.1own 29.6
Available yards46.7%78.3%
Scoring opportunities70.0%77.8%
Points per opportunity4.436.00
Three-and-out rate40.0%0.0%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
41.5%
Expected, given the spots
55.2%
Over expected
-13.8
Fourth down vs peers
-25
Fourth down vs the model
-67
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Louisiana is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Louisiana in 2026

by EPA/play distance
StanfordSP+ -4.7
Off EPA/play +0.278Def EPA/play +0.244Elo 1354
Match
97%
Oregon StateSP+ -6.8
Off EPA/play +0.232Def EPA/play +0.253Elo 1260
Match
97%
Southern MissSP+ -14.9
Off EPA/play +0.234Def EPA/play +0.157Elo 1350
Match
97%
MemphisSP+ +2.1
Off EPA/play +0.297Def EPA/play +0.229Elo 1566
Match
97%
Boise StateSP+ +5.2
Off EPA/play +0.296Def EPA/play +0.182Elo 1569
Match
97%
Florida StateSP+ +6.9
Off EPA/play +0.242Def EPA/play +0.268Elo 1557
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -17.2, #109 of 1282016: -14.8, #106 of 1282017: -17.1, #112 of 1302018: -7.4, #96 of 1302019: +9.8, #31 of 1302020: +12.6, #21 of 1242021: +5.3, #52 of 1302022: -4.4, #81 of 1312023: -0.9, #66 of 1332024: -0.6, #70 of 1342025: -20.6, #126 of 1362026: +4.5, #54 of 138
20152026
Now +4.5 · #54 of 138Best +12.6 in 2020Worst -20.6 in 2025

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.0+0.0
20256-75-3
46%
5.0+1.0
202410-47-2
71%
9.6+0.4
20236-73-5
46%
6.6-0.6
20226-74-4
46%
5.7+0.3
202113-19-0
93%
9.0+4.0
202010-17-1
91%
7.1+2.9
201911-37-2
79%
10.8+0.2
20187-75-4
50%
5.5+1.5
20175-74-4
42%
4.8+0.2

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

1.6%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 8.0-4.3. Wins the Sun Belt in 13%.

If they finish with…

36%
1 loss
1.5%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

Win out and it is 36%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

up 0.9 points since preseason.

  • At 2 losses they are 1.5% where the average Sun Belt team is 2.1%.
  • The Sun Belt takes 0.20 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 1.6% of seasons, having won their league in 98% of those.

Louisiana’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk6at Louisiana Tech3.7
  • wk7vs Troy2.6
  • wk10vs South Alabama2.4
  • wk5vs Arkansas State2.4
  • wk12vs Coastal Carolina2.3
  • wk4at Charlotte2.2

Who to root for

Games Louisiana is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk5Utah State over Boise State0.7
  • wk3Oklahoma over New Mexico0.7
  • wk9Texas State over Boise State0.6
  • wk11UNLV over New Mexico0.6
  • wk8Washington State over Boise State0.6
  • wk6Fresno State over Boise State0.5
The full playoff picture →

Sun Belt

West division · 0-0 in league play, projected 5.4-2.62 of 14 by title odds
13%
Wins the Sun Belt
31%
Reaches the title game

The Sun Belt keeps divisions (East and West) and sends the winner of each — so Louisiana can finish with the league’s second-best record and still stay home. The last berth is level on percentage in 46% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk6Louisiana at Louisiana Tech20.9
  • wk7Troy at Louisiana15.3
  • wk10South Alabama at Louisiana15.3
  • wk5Arkansas State at Louisiana14.9

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Sun Belt race →

If not the playoff, then

88%
Bowl eligible
85%
Placed in a bowl
1.6%
In the playoff
13%
Season over in November

Louisiana is 1-1 and needs 5 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Frisco Bowl18%
  • New Mexico Bowl13%
  • Cure Bowl11%
  • Boca Raton Bowl8.1%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl7.3%
  • New Orleans Bowl7.1%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 10 have sent Louisiana a player since 2010 — 31 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Louisiana's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
NevilleLA61
PlaquemineLA52
Archbishop RummelLA30
ManvelTX30
Southern LabLA30
St. AugustineLA30
Baton Rouge CatholicLA20
DutchtownGA20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.