Skip to content

UT Rio Grande Valley

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

Southland · 11-16 · AdjEM -12.1, 297 of 364 nationally.

2024-25 seasonthrough ratings as of 2025-04-0724 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2025-04-07

Every team →
AdjEM
-12.1297 of 364
AdjO
98.9275 of 364
AdjD
111.1295 of 364
AdjT
73.027 of 364

UT Rio Grande Valley went from -16.6 (#334) on 2024-11-03 to -12.1 (#297) on 2025-04-07, peaking at -9.8 (#270) on 2024-11-25.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2024-11-032025-04-07

Four factorsraw season rates · 27 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
51.3%145
TOV%
17.9%305
OREB%
27.4%194
FTA/FGA
22.0%364
Opp eFG%
51.7%227
Opp TOV%
16.8%115
DREB%
66.1%356
Opp FTA/FGA
30.6%118

Résumé11-16 · against the ratings of 2025-04-07

Schedule strength
-4.9270 of 364
Non-conference
+1.1153 of 364
Luck
+2.8%127 of 364
Wins above bubble
-12.1221 of 364
Quad 1
0-4
Quad 2
0-1
Quad 3
0-3
Quad 4
11-8

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players17 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →
PlayerGMPGPPGRPGAPGeFG%TS%USG%3P%FT%
Cliff DavisG3030.612.14.52.053.0%53.2%19.8%37.4%58.8%
DK ThornG3029.912.63.72.052.2%55.0%20.6%34.2%85.2%
Trey MillerG3128.910.12.64.348.7%51.3%20.7%26.5%68.6%
Howie Fleming Jr.G3126.612.36.42.463.7%65.3%21.2%42.2%70.2%
K.T. RaimeyG2819.69.92.31.148.7%52.5%26.2%28.7%79.7%
Kwo AgwaF3017.66.24.30.858.6%60.6%16.5%26.1%69.8%
Marshal DestremauF3013.34.13.80.958.3%58.8%16.0%35.7%58.6%
Hasan Abdul HakimG1228.913.36.82.954.3%55.9%24.0%32.7%65.6%
Jaylen WashingtonG2213.82.81.52.136.7%38.9%15.9%21.4%70.0%
Tommy GankhuyagF1911.93.82.00.863.0%63.1%16.1%37.5%62.5%
RJ NanceG227.11.70.90.532.4%32.9%20.7%16.1%37.5%
Mustafo VanjovC94.80.70.60.466.7%75.9%7.8%0.0%100.0%
Fadi MougharbelG94.10.60.90.333.3%36.0%10.4%0.0%50.0%
J.J. HowardG37.71.31.00.040.0%36.5%13.6%—0.0%
Justin MitchellG82.80.80.50.633.3%43.2%15.3%0.0%100.0%
Isaiah BarganierF27.50.50.00.00.0%12.7%12.7%0.0%50.0%
EJ AvelarG61.51.00.00.060.0%60.0%26.8%0.0%—

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games11-16

“Ours” is our projected margin for UT Rio Grande Valley, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentQuadResultOurs
11-04@NebraskaQ1#52L 67-87-28.8
11-06@CreightonQ1#26L 86-99-33.1
11-15nCharleston SouthernQ4#314W 86-76+2.0
11-16nTennessee TechQ4#285L 58-83+1.1
11-18@WisconsinQ1#19L 84-87-24.6
11-25vsLe MoyneQ4#351W 97-77+5.7
12-05vsStephen F. AustinQ4#264W 68-65-3.5
12-07vsLamarQ4#203L 52-84+3.8
12-18vsSouthern UtahQ4#293W 78-73-1.7
01-04@New OrleansQ4#355W 76-64+1.8
01-06@SE LouisianaQ4#243L 75-79-7.0
01-11@Texas A&M-Corpus ChristiQ3#182L 74-79-10.6
01-13vsEast Texas A&MQ4#342W 57-55+10.7
01-18@Houston ChristianQ4#316L 57-66+0.7
01-20@Incarnate WordQ4#258W 85-78-3.4
01-25vsMcNeeseQ2#72L 63-93-13.3
01-27vsNichollsQ4#191L 75-82-2.4
02-01vsTexas A&M-Corpus ChristiQ4#182W 83-73-5.4
02-03@Northwestern StateQ4#260L 63-79-4.8
02-08@LamarQ3#203L 68-70-8.0
02-10@Stephen F. AustinQ4#264L 75-85-6.5
02-15vsHouston ChristianQ4#316W 76-52+4.1
02-17vsIncarnate WordQ4#258L 60-66+2.4
02-22@NichollsQ3#191L 84-93-9.1
02-24@McNeeseQ1#72L 65-100-18.4
03-01vsNew OrleansQ4#355W 88-78+9.7
03-03vsSE LouisianaQ4#243W 77-76-0.8

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.