Skip to content

UT Rio Grande Valley

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

Southland · 17-14 · AdjEM +6.0, 94 of 364 nationally.

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Adjusted ratingas of 2026-04-06

Every team →
AdjEM
+6.094 of 364
AdjO
109.2123 of 364
AdjD
103.287 of 364
AdjT
69.2229 of 364

UT Rio Grande Valley went from +6.9 (#24) on 2025-11-10 to +6.0 (#94) on 2026-04-06, peaking at +6.9 (#24) on 2025-11-10.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2025-11-102026-04-06

Four factorsraw season rates · 31 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
54.7%44
TOV%
16.7%261
OREB%
—
FTA/FGA
28.9%329
Opp eFG%
47.8%36
Opp TOV%
15.2%205
DREB%
-201.0%351
Opp FTA/FGA
39.0%282

Games17-14

“Ours” is our projected margin for UT Rio Grande Valley, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentResultOurs
11-03@BaylorL 81-96—
11-08@Southern UtahW 95-72—
11-11@Boise StateL 65-85-10.5
11-22@Missouri StateL 67-74-5.2
11-24@IllinoisL 73-87-15.8
12-03@Stephen F. AustinL 60-73-9.3
12-07vsAustin PeayW 63-50+3.1
12-11vsUT ArlingtonL 50-55+6.4
12-16@LamarW 83-72-3.1
12-29vsNew OrleansL 69-85+11.8
12-31vsNichollsL 69-71+7.9
01-03vsTexas A&M-Corpus ChristiL 59-63+8.7
01-05vsIncarnate WordW 80-67+7.2
01-10@East Texas A&ML 69-77+1.4
01-12@Northwestern StateL 63-64+2.3
01-17vsMcNeeseW 79-76-4.0
01-19vsSE LouisianaW 68-65+8.8
01-24@Houston ChristianW 68-51+2.0
01-26@Texas A&M-Corpus ChristiW 64-55-3.6
01-31@Incarnate WordW 106-93+1.6
02-02vsHouston ChristianW 74-57+12.2
02-07@New OrleansW 95-76+0.2
02-09@NichollsW 92-72+1.1
02-14vsStephen F. AustinL 57-66+1.4
02-16vsLamarW 70-65+8.6
02-21@SE LouisianaW 96-75+5.6
02-23@McNeeseL 68-75-8.8
02-28vsEast Texas A&MW 63-55+14.9
03-02vsNorthwestern StateW 74-62+13.2
03-09vsNichollsW 86-68+11.2
03-10@McNeeseL 80-84-7.7

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.