High Point

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

Big South · 11-18 · AdjEM -5.0, 247 of 359 nationally.

2021-22 seasonthrough ratings as of 2022-04-0421 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2022-04-04

Every team →

AdjEM: -5.0247 of 359
AdjO: 97.4252 of 359
AdjD: 102.5224 of 359
AdjT: 69.9161 of 359

High Point went from -5.4 (#318) on 2021-11-15 to -5.0 (#247) on 2022-04-04, peaking at -4.4 (#241) on 2022-02-28.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2021-11-152022-04-04

Four factorsraw season rates · 29 complete games

Leaderboards →

eFG%: 48.9%226
TOV%: 17.9%227
OREB%: 25.8%178
FTA/FGA: 33.9%69
Opp eFG%: 49.5%154
Opp TOV%: 17.1%194
DREB%: 71.5%265
Opp FTA/FGA: 35.3%293

Résumé11-18 · against the ratings of 2022-04-04

Schedule strength: -1.7215 of 359
Non-conference: +4.068 of 359
Luck: -5.9%297 of 359
Wins above bubble: -11.6274 of 359

Quad 1: 0-3
Quad 2: 0-3
Quad 3: 2-4
Quad 4: 9-8

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players15 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →

Player	G	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	eFG%	TS%	USG%	3P%	FT%
John-Michael WrightG	32	34.9	18.4	4.4	3.4	47.8%	52.8%	29.8%	36.3%	77.8%
Zack AustinF	32	34.7	14.4	8.0	1.5	49.7%	52.2%	23.2%	32.2%	72.4%
Bryant RandlemanG	30	31.6	7.0	3.5	3.4	51.6%	53.1%	13.8%	27.3%	55.6%
Jaden HouseG	31	28.9	12.3	4.1	1.4	50.5%	53.4%	24.5%	33.6%	68.6%
Emmanuel IzunaborF	32	21.0	5.1	5.0	0.5	53.4%	52.8%	15.9%	—	46.8%
Rob Peterson IIIF	31	18.8	1.6	3.1	1.2	32.7%	37.4%	8.9%	0.0%	50.0%
Alex HoltF	32	17.9	6.7	3.6	0.4	62.4%	59.6%	18.9%	—	43.8%
Bryson ChildressG	31	11.2	2.8	0.7	0.3	51.2%	52.2%	14.1%	35.1%	71.4%
Brock WilliamsG	21	8.1	1.7	0.6	0.7	35.5%	38.8%	17.8%	27.3%	53.3%
Caleb WrightF	11	4.8	0.9	0.8	0.2	35.7%	35.7%	16.7%	50.0%	—
Caden SanchezF	6	7.7	2.2	1.0	0.0	54.5%	54.4%	15.8%	—	50.0%
John-Michael HughesG	5	5.4	1.2	0.6	0.4	50.0%	46.3%	16.4%	40.0%	0.0%
AJ HoynackG	4	3.5	1.0	0.5	0.8	0.0%	37.6%	19.8%	0.0%	57.1%
Jake KovermanF	1	10.0	5.0	1.0	2.0	62.5%	62.5%	20.9%	50.0%	—
David CaraherF	1	9.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	0.0%	0.0%	34.8%	0.0%	—

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games11-18

“Ours” is our projected margin for High Point, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

Date	Opponent	Quad	Result	Ours	Pace	Snapshot
11-12	@Northwestern	Q2#95	L 60-95	—
11-16	@Notre Dame	Q1#39	L 61-70	-15.7	70	11-15
11-20	vsHoward	Q4#224	W 73-63	+3.8	67	11-15
11-21	vsGeorgia State	Q4#174	L 66-74	+7.4	73	11-15
11-30	vsFurman	Q2#64	L 70-74	+2.0	75	11-29
12-04	@Elon	Q4#277	W 83-77	-6.0	73	11-29
12-10	nSouth Carolina State	Q4#307	L 66-67	+2.6	75	12-06
12-18	vsUNC Wilmington	Q4#163	L 69-71	+8.3	71	12-13
12-21	vsFlorida Atlantic	Q3#112	W 55-52	+1.9	71	12-20
12-29	@Michigan State	Q1#48	L 68-81	-20.0	71	12-27
12-31	@Kentucky	Q1#8	L 48-92	-21.4	71	12-27
01-12	@South Carolina Upstate	Q4#259	L 65-66	-5.2	70	01-10
01-15	vsNorth Carolina A&T	Q4#278	W 78-71	+2.8	70	01-10
01-19	@Charleston Southern	Q4#354	L 66-70	+3.1	72	01-17
01-22	@Hampton	Q4#326	L 64-68	-3.0	69	01-17
01-24	vsWinthrop	Q3#137	W 65-56	+1.3	71	01-17
01-26	vsRadford	Q4#295	W 63-58	+5.9	70	01-24
01-29	@Campbell	Q3#198	L 72-77	-8.4	67	01-24
02-02	vsGardner-Webb	Q3#148	L 57-65	-1.2	69	01-31
02-05	vsUNC Asheville	Q4#188	W 91-83	+1.7	70	01-31
02-09	@Presbyterian	Q4#281	W 79-70	-2.5	69	02-07
02-12	vsCampbell	Q4#198	L 42-60	+0.0	67	02-07
02-15	@Longwood	Q2#127	L 66-70	-9.9	70	02-14
02-17	vsLongwood	Q3#127	L 71-78	-2.4	70	02-14
02-19	@Radford	Q4#295	L 64-66	-1.0	69	02-14
02-23	@North Carolina A&T	Q4#278	W 78-58	-3.1	70	02-21
02-26	vsHampton	Q4#326	W 88-77	+8.4	70	02-21
03-02	nHampton	Q4#326	W 84-77	+5.6	70	02-28
03-04	nWinthrop	Q3#137	L 51-68	-4.4	70	02-28

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 359 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.