High Point

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

Big South · 27-6 · AdjEM +9.1, 88 of 364 nationally.

2024-25 seasonthrough ratings as of 2025-04-0724 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2025-04-07

Every team →

AdjEM: +9.188 of 364
AdjO: 115.536 of 364
AdjD: 106.4202 of 364
AdjT: 68.3256 of 364

High Point went from +6.2 (#112) on 2024-11-03 to +9.1 (#88) on 2025-04-07, peaking at +9.2 (#89) on 2025-03-17.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2024-11-032025-04-07

Four factorsraw season rates · 33 complete games

Leaderboards →

eFG%: 56.3%13
TOV%: 14.3%52
OREB%: 32.2%65
FTA/FGA: 37.2%55
Opp eFG%: 49.1%91
Opp TOV%: 15.4%229
DREB%: 71.8%212
Opp FTA/FGA: 36.3%265

Résumé27-6 · against the ratings of 2025-04-07

Schedule strength: -5.1276 of 364
Non-conference: -2.6274 of 364
Luck: +1.9%145 of 364
Wins above bubble: -2.868 of 364

Quad 1: 0-1
Quad 2: 1-1
Quad 3: 7-2
Quad 4: 19-2

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players18 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →

Player	G	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	eFG%	TS%	USG%	3P%	FT%
Kezza GiffaG	34	28.2	14.6	2.5	2.5	49.9%	58.1%	26.1%	31.3%	85.1%
D'Maurian WilliamsG	32	26.7	13.5	3.3	2.3	54.6%	59.7%	24.2%	40.5%	82.0%
Kimani HamiltonF	35	24.2	13.1	4.6	2.2	56.5%	60.3%	27.0%	32.2%	72.3%
Chase JohnstonG	35	22.1	6.9	1.8	1.0	60.7%	60.6%	14.5%	42.5%	50.0%
Juslin Bodo BodoC	35	21.7	5.3	8.4	0.2	64.3%	62.5%	11.8%	—	53.4%
Bobby PettifordG	30	21.4	8.8	2.5	3.4	60.4%	63.9%	19.5%	40.0%	86.0%
Trae BenhamG	35	15.3	4.2	2.5	0.3	57.5%	59.5%	12.9%	37.4%	80.0%
Abdoulaye ThiamG	35	13.8	6.0	1.3	0.4	57.6%	60.5%	20.7%	33.3%	82.9%
Terry AndersonF	26	13.1	4.5	2.8	0.9	57.7%	58.4%	18.4%	35.0%	58.3%
Simon HildebrandtF	25	13.4	5.5	3.0	0.4	55.8%	58.6%	21.9%	33.9%	74.2%
Josh IbukunoluwaF	25	9.4	3.1	2.7	0.4	58.8%	60.8%	15.7%	16.7%	73.3%
Titas SargiunasF	13	6.5	1.5	0.5	0.4	34.6%	37.1%	22.4%	15.4%	100.0%
Braden HausenF	7	8.4	2.6	0.3	0.6	63.6%	67.3%	14.3%	50.0%	80.0%
Ivan MatlekovicC	5	6.2	2.6	1.8	0.2	75.0%	76.7%	19.0%	—	100.0%
Liam CarneyG	9	3.1	1.4	0.8	0.0	50.0%	52.7%	22.6%	50.0%	57.1%
David FonvilleG	5	4.4	1.8	0.4	0.2	56.3%	56.3%	18.7%	33.3%	—
Andrew SinewayG	9	2.0	1.2	0.4	0.1	71.4%	69.2%	22.7%	0.0%	50.0%
Birgir IrvingF	9	1.8	0.6	0.2	0.0	50.0%	50.0%	16.1%	100.0%	—

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games27-6

“Ours” is our projected margin for High Point, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

Date	Opponent	Quad	Result	Ours	Pace	Snapshot
11-06	vsCoppin State	Q4#362	W 93-51	+23.1	71	11-04
11-09	vsJackson State	Q4#273	W 80-71	+21.2	71	11-04
11-12	vsNorth Carolina Central	Q4#321	W 76-60	+15.6	71	11-11
11-15	vsUAB	Q3#101	W 68-65	+7.1	71	11-11
11-18	vsAmerican University	Q4#236	W 80-73	+12.7	69	11-11
11-24	nMissouri State	Q4#216	L 61-71	+4.8	71	11-18
11-25	nOld Dominion	Q4#308	W 73-67	+18.2	71	11-18
11-26	nHampton	Q4#242	W 76-73	+11.2	69	11-25
12-03	@UNC Greensboro	Q2#128	L 68-72	-4.9	68	12-02
12-06	vsNorth Texas	Q2#64	W 76-71	-5.2	66	12-02
12-14	nApp State	Q3#148	W 65-59	+1.0	68	12-09
12-21	@Southern Illinois	Q3#166	W 94-81	-0.7	70	12-16
12-29	vsNorfolk State	Q4#205	L 74-77	+8.1	69	12-23
01-02	vsRadford	Q4#176	W 76-58	+9.6	68	12-30
01-04	@UNC Asheville	Q3#200	L 99-103	+1.4	69	12-30
01-08	@Charleston Southern	Q4#314	W 93-79	+8.3	70	01-06
01-11	vsGardner-Webb	Q4#256	W 96-55	+10.5	70	01-06
01-16	@Longwood	Q3#215	L 80-82	+4.2	70	01-13
01-18	vsPresbyterian	Q4#249	W 77-66	+14.9	69	01-13
01-22	@South Carolina Upstate	Q4#348	W 86-77	+14.9	71	01-20
01-25	vsWinthrop	Q4#172	W 84-62	+10.6	72	01-20
02-01	@Presbyterian	Q4#249	W 84-72	+8.8	68	01-27
02-05	@Radford	Q3#176	W 78-75	+4.4	67	02-03
02-08	vsUNC Asheville	Q4#200	W 104-100	+9.7	69	02-03
02-13	vsLongwood	Q4#215	W 83-72	+9.9	69	02-10
02-15	@Winthrop	Q3#172	W 88-66	+4.5	72	02-10
02-19	vsCharleston Southern	Q4#314	W 83-60	+16.6	70	02-17
02-22	@Gardner-Webb	Q4#256	W 90-67	+7.2	70	02-17
02-26	vsSouth Carolina Upstate	Q4#348	W 88-66	+23.1	71	02-24
03-07	nGardner-Webb	Q4#256	W 85-64	+12.0	70	03-03
03-08	nRadford	Q3#176	W 76-73	+7.0	67	03-03
03-09	nWinthrop	Q3#172	W 81-69	+7.6	72	03-03
03-20	nPurdue	Q1#14	L 63-75	-11.1	68	03-17

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.