Skip to content

Tulsa

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

American · 11-20 · AdjEM -2.9, 218 of 359 nationally.

2021-22 seasonthrough ratings as of 2022-04-0421 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2022-04-04

Every team →
AdjEM
-2.9218 of 359
AdjO
99.7203 of 359
AdjD
102.6234 of 359
AdjT
69.4193 of 359

Tulsa went from -4.5 (#303) on 2021-11-15 to -2.9 (#218) on 2022-04-04, peaking at -1.1 (#195) on 2022-01-10.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2021-11-152022-04-04

Four factorsraw season rates · 31 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
49.6%197
TOV%
18.1%235
OREB%
23.2%276
FTA/FGA
31.0%149
Opp eFG%
52.2%274
Opp TOV%
18.9%79
DREB%
71.5%264
Opp FTA/FGA
29.0%148

Résumé11-20 · against the ratings of 2022-04-04

Schedule strength
+2.9108 of 359
Non-conference
-3.0309 of 359
Luck
-3.5%247 of 359
Wins above bubble
-10.4250 of 359
Quad 1
0-6
Quad 2
1-6
Quad 3
4-5
Quad 4
6-3

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players15 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →
PlayerGMPGPPGRPGAPGeFG%TS%USG%3P%FT%
Jeriah HorneF3133.916.16.91.553.0%57.3%24.8%41.5%83.8%
Sam GriffinG3130.314.61.71.946.8%50.1%28.5%33.3%85.1%
Darien JacksonG3128.710.43.21.861.3%63.0%18.7%40.4%68.2%
Curtis Haywood IIG3022.93.22.61.839.9%45.6%11.1%27.3%75.0%
Rey IdowuF3121.57.94.70.752.8%55.5%20.1%0.0%64.3%
Anthony PritchardG2720.84.42.63.037.2%41.2%18.1%19.0%73.3%
Tim DalgerF2814.64.72.90.444.9%49.0%21.0%22.7%62.5%
LaDavius DraineG2813.83.42.00.551.7%52.0%14.8%32.3%60.0%
Nikita KonstantynovskyiF278.72.02.70.152.8%56.3%14.8%—63.0%
Keyshawn Embery-SimpsonG1219.23.60.81.346.5%47.9%12.5%34.5%75.0%
Sterling Gaston-ChapmanG175.11.50.80.044.1%49.9%18.8%20.0%58.8%
Josh EarleyF55.80.81.00.040.0%40.0%14.5%——
Gavyn ElkamilG44.30.01.30.00.0%0.0%18.6%0.0%—
Peyton UrbancicG32.31.00.30.00.0%34.3%32.9%0.0%60.0%
Ari SealsG31.30.70.30.0100.0%100.0%13.1%——

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games11-20

“Ours” is our projected margin for Tulsa, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentQuadResultOurs
11-10vsNorthwestern StateQ4#333W 82-75—
11-13vsAir ForceQ4#274L 58-59—
11-15vsOregon StateQ4#286W 64-58—
11-20nRhode IslandQ3#136W 77-71-3.8
11-21nUtahQ3#159L 58-72-6.7
11-26vsLittle RockQ4#327W 77-63+11.6
11-29@Oral RobertsQ3#145L 80-87-11.1
12-03@Boise StateQ1#38L 58-63-12.1
12-07vsLoyola MarymountQ4#235L 55-60+8.5
12-11vsSouthern IllinoisQ3#131W 69-65+3.6
12-16vsAlcorn StateQ4#273W 83-62+6.1
12-29vsSMUQ2#44L 69-74+0.0
01-04@MemphisQ1#28L 64-67-15.0
01-12vsTempleQ3#130L 64-69+4.0
01-15vsHoustonQ1#2L 64-66-11.2
01-20@CincinnatiQ2#102L 69-90-11.4
01-23vsMemphisQ1#28L 81-83-2.0
01-26@TulaneQ2#91L 63-97-7.4
01-29vsSouth FloridaQ4#283W 76-45+5.8
02-01@Wichita StateQ2#87L 48-58-10.6
02-05@TempleQ2#130L 58-67-6.9
02-08vsEast CarolinaQ4#217L 71-73+4.4
02-12vsCincinnatiQ3#102W 83-77-3.2
02-14@UCFQ2#108L 67-76-9.6
02-19@South FloridaQ4#283W 65-57-0.9
02-23@SMUQ1#44L 61-75-13.2
02-26@East CarolinaQ3#217L 59-64-3.2
03-02vsWichita StateQ3#87L 62-72-3.6
03-06vsUCFQ3#108W 73-72-2.5
03-10nWichita StateQ2#87W 73-67-7.5
03-11nSMUQ1#44L 58-83-9.9

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 359 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.