Skip to content
Jordan James

#20Jordan James

RB·Oregon·20244.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jordan James is a Featured Back for Oregon. Jordan's 2024 season ranks in the 85th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 250 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jordan James's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1267 Rush yards15 Rush TD233 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
26 Receptions209 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns19 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency85
  • Volume78
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency86
  • Receiving41
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)85th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (85th percentile).
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Purdue (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
LeVante BellamyWestern Michigan0.4005.4107.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 1 vs Idaho: +0.59 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boise State: +0.22 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon State: +0.71 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs UCLA: +0.44 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Michigan State: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ohio State: +0.15 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Purdue: +0.71 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Illinois: +0.36 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan: +0.10 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Maryland: +0.54 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wisconsin: +0.22 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Washington: +0.51 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Penn State: +0.37 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIdahoW24-1415956.3144000.59
2vsBoise StateW37-3410.1171026.000200.22
3@Oregon StateW49-14-6.712867.222000.71
5@UCLAW34-13-1.3201035.2121500.44
6vsMichigan StateW31-10-4.6241666.911400.32
7vsOhio StateW32-3131.2231155.011600.15
8@PurdueW35-0-16.210505.021600.71
9vsIllinoisW38-99.615835.5021700.36
10@MichiganW38-1710.6231175.110.10
11vsMarylandW39-18-3.97294.1122700.54
12@WisconsinW16-133.0251214.8122500.22
14vsWashingtonW49-213.115996.6244000.51
15vsPenn StateW45-3724.620874.4232000.37
20vsOhio StateL21-4131.27142.00270

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.3%
Passing plays
6.1%
Rushing plays
48.4%
Standard downs
32.3%
Passing downs
14.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.830−0.53
EPA per play · 2024 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.