Skip to content
Jeremiyah Love

#4Jeremiyah Love

RB·Notre Dame·202520243.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jeremiyah Love is a 2-year Explosive Back for Notre Dame. Jeremiyah's 2024 season ranks in the 93th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 183 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jeremiyah Love's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1125 Rush yards17 Rush TD163 Carries6.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions237 Rec yards2 Rec TD8.5 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns0 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency93
  • Volume55
  • Explosiveness78
  • Consistency75
  • Receiving62
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)93th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.17 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Army (SP+ 9).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Tyjae SpearsTulane0.4505.7105.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1701.17Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +0.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Illinois: +0.38 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Purdue: +0.58 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Miami (OH): +0.42 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisville: -0.08 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Stanford: +0.70 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: -0.07 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Navy: +0.62 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Florida State: +0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia: +0.46 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Army: +1.17 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs USC: +0.48 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Texas A&MW23-1317.014916.511300.17
2vsNorthern IllinoisL14-16-3.511797.2121000.38
3@PurdueW66-7-16.21010910.9121800.58
4vsMiami (OH)W28-31.311605.511900.42
5vsLouisvilleW31-2413.611343.115271-0.08
7vsStanfordW49-7-8.26538.8112500.70
8vsGeorgia TechW31-131.914362.613570-0.07
9vsNavyW51-143.5121028.521-200.62
11vsFlorida StateW52-3-3.29192.1111300.04
12vsVirginiaW35-14-5.1161378.621200.46
13vsArmyW49-149.2713018.621611.17
14@USCW49-3511.913997.6133800.48
20vsPenn StateW27-2424.611464.21160
20vsGeorgiaW23-1024.36193.20120
20vsIndianaW27-1720.1810813.512180
20vsOhio StateL23-3431.2430.80250

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.2%
Passing plays
6.5%
Rushing plays
29.9%
Standard downs
22.0%
Passing downs
12.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.20
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.760−0.642025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 28 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024Notre Dame
3.7
83.2
2025Notre Dame
3.2
50.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.