Skip to content
Jamal Roberts

#20Jamal Roberts

RB·Missouri·20252.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jamal Roberts is a Pass-Catching Back for Missouri. Jamal's 2025 season ranks in the 93th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 149 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jamal Roberts's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
753 Rush yards6 Rush TD124 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions141 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.8 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns21 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency93
  • Volume46
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency58
  • Receiving82
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)93th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency58th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.14 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.93 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Arkansas (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9300.93Wk 1 vs Central Arkansas: +0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas: +0.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisiana: +0.22 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Carolina: +0.43 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Massachusetts: +0.24 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Alabama: +0.41 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Auburn: -0.09 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Vanderbilt: -0.21 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Texas A&M: +0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mississippi State: +0.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oklahoma: -0.20 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Arkansas: +0.93 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCentral ArkansasW61-68334.101800.03
2vsKansasW42-314.11314311.012900.65
3vsLouisianaW52-10-10.18465.8013910.22
4vsSouth CarolinaW29-205.913765.810.43
5vsMassachusettsW42-6-36.66528.7121500.24
7vsAlabamaL24-2714.855010.0032700.41
8@AuburnW23-1711.6362.002130-0.09
9@VanderbiltL10-1720.310222.20120-0.21
11vsTexas A&ML17-3820.7171106.511100.43
12vsMississippi StateW49-274.19455.000.02
13@OklahomaL6-1718.310141.403150-0.20
14@ArkansasW31-175.1111009.1111000.93
20vsVirginiaL7-1311.111565.11120

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.1%
Passing plays
7.3%
Rushing plays
23.1%
Standard downs
17.3%
Passing downs
13.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.04 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.050−0.33
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.