Skip to content
Jake Browning

#3Jake Browning

QB·Washington·2018201611.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jake Browning is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Washington. Jake's 2016 season ranks in the 85th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 418 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jake Browning's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
243/391 Comp/Att3430 Pass yards43 Pass TD9 INT62.1% Comp %
Rushing
45 Rush yards4 Rush TD65 Carries0.7 Yards/carry
Punting
3 Punts122 Punt yards40.7 Yards/punt50 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency85
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch48
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)85th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (85th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.35 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.00 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Oregon (SP+ 6).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0001.00Wk 1 vs Rutgers: +0.43 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Idaho: +0.73 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Portland State: +0.82 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona: +0.42 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Stanford: +0.88 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oregon: +1.00 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Oregon State: +0.55 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Utah: +0.53 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs California: +0.94 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs USC: +0.21 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arizona State: +0.24 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington State: +0.68 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Colorado: +0.03 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Alabama: -0.25 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsRutgersW48-13-14.918/272873197.2-900.43
2vsIdahoW59-14-8.623/282945077.0-100.73
3vsPortland StateW41-312/191634095.5100.82
4@ArizonaW35-28-4.514/211602184.72810.42
5vsStanfordW44-616.415/212103097.9800.88
6@OregonW70-216.122/283046096.42121.00
8vsOregon StateW41-17-4.614/282913094.32110.55
9@UtahW31-2410.912/201862153.5-600.53
10@CaliforniaW66-272.419/283786098.41400.94
11vsUSCL13-2623.617/362591229.0-3600.21
12vsArizona StateW44-18-3.027/443382242.31900.24
13@Washington StateW45-176.221/292923093.1400.68
14vsColoradoW41-106.39/241182021.6200.03
1vsAlabamaL7-2431.720/381501214.2-210-0.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.8%
Passing plays
95.8%
Rushing plays
8.2%
Standard downs
43.0%
Passing downs
60.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.44
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / 0.62

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.130−0.382018
EPA per play · 2016 — 2018 · 28 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Washington
11.1
254.7
2018Washington
6.5
208.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.