Skip to content
Brenden Knox

#20Brenden Knox

RB·Marshall·202020191.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Brenden Knox is a 2-year Featured Back for Marshall. Brenden's 2020 season ranks in the 15th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 177 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brenden Knox's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
887 Rush yards9 Rush TD185 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions86 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.3 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns26 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency15
  • Volume91
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency63
  • Receiving22
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)15th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.31 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Western Kentucky (SP+ -3).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Eastern Kentucky: +0.38 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs App State: +0.20 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Western Kentucky: +0.68 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.25 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.25 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Massachusetts: +0.60 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.16 EPA/play11Wk 14 vs Rice: -0.07 EPA/play14Wk 16 vs UAB: -0.09 EPA/play16
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsEastern KentuckyW59-018854.710.38
3vsApp StateW17-710.3281384.910.20
6@Western KentuckyW38-14-3.2151077.130.68
7@Louisiana TechW35-17-7.0321253.9211300.25
8vsFlorida AtlanticW20-9-0.3251014.0025510.25
10vsMassachusettsW51-10-31.3141188.4221000.60
11vsMiddle TennesseeW42-14-11.716704.40140-0.16
14vsRiceL0-20-9.220763.80140-0.07
16vsUABL13-226.317673.90-0.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.9%
Passing plays
3.8%
Rushing plays
53.5%
Standard downs
35.0%
Passing downs
23.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.30
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.770−0.252020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Marshall
2.1
64.3
2020Marshall
1.7
45.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.