Skip to content
Braelon Allen

Braelon Allen

RB·Wisconsin·2023202220212.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Braelon Allen is a 3-year Featured Back for Wisconsin. Braelon's 2023 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 206 plays — a average rate for the RB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braelon Allen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2021

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9159
National rank
#227
High school
Fond Du Lac
Hometown
Fond Du Lac, WI

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2023 Production

Rushing
984 Rush yards12 Rush TD181 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions131 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume76
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency31
  • Receiving46
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency31th %ile · below avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.58 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Purdue (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5800.58Wk 1 vs Buffalo: +0.22 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: -0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Southern: +0.56 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Purdue: +0.58 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Rutgers: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Iowa: +0.05 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Illinois: +0.37 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio State: -0.11 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Northwestern: -0.28 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Nebraska: -0.06 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Minnesota: +0.19 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBuffaloW38-17-15.2171418.3272500.22
2@Washington StateL22-314.97202.906110-0.32
3vsGeorgia SouthernW35-14-5.212947.822500.56
4@PurdueW38-17-7.3161167.321900.58
6vsRutgersW24-133.5211014.8121400.20
7vsIowaL6-155.818874.8031600.05
8@IllinoisW25-21-2.5291455.0121600.37
9vsOhio StateL10-2425.210505.00100-0.11
11vsNorthwesternL10-24-1.3331.00180-0.28
12vsNebraskaW24-170.322622.82-0.06
13@MinnesotaW28-140.4261656.3232700.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.7%
Passing plays
6.7%
Rushing plays
48.0%
Standard downs
31.4%
Passing downs
15.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.05 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.090−0.7320222023
EPA per play · 2021 — 2023 · 34 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Wisconsin
3.1
67.9
2022Wisconsin
2.3
54.2
2023Wisconsin
2.8
58.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.