Skip to content
Braelon Allen

Braelon Allen

RB·Wisconsin·2023202220213.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Braelon Allen is a 3-year Featured Back for Wisconsin. Braelon's 2021 season ranks in the 45th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 186 plays — a average rate for the RB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braelon Allen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2021

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9159
National rank
#227
High school
Fond Du Lac
Hometown
Fond Du Lac, WI

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2021 Production

Rushing
1268 Rush yards12 Rush TD186 Carries6.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions39 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency45
  • Volume78
  • Explosiveness76
  • Consistency68
  • Receiving29
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)45th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Eastern Michigan (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs Penn State: +0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.94 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Michigan: +0.05 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Illinois: +0.04 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Army: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Purdue: +0.53 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Iowa: +0.10 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Rutgers: +0.51 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Northwestern: +0.37 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Nebraska: +0.62 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Minnesota: -0.16 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Arizona State: +0.05 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsPenn StateL10-1614.30.05
2vsEastern MichiganW34-7-7.87304.310.94
5vsMichiganL17-3823.45193.800.05
6@IllinoisW24-04.3181317.310.04
7vsArmyW20-144.7161086.810.28
8@PurdueW30-1310.31214011.721900.53
9vsIowaW27-711.4201045.200.10
10@RutgersW52-3-3.0151298.610.51
11vsNorthwesternW35-7-11.1251736.9311600.37
12vsNebraskaW35-2810.32222810.430.62
13@MinnesotaL13-2314.417472.804120-0.16
1vsArizona StateW20-1311.8291595.502200.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.2%
Passing plays
4.3%
Rushing plays
38.6%
Standard downs
32.3%
Passing downs
12.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.09 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.090−0.7320222023
EPA per play · 2021 — 2023 · 34 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Wisconsin
3.1
67.9
2022Wisconsin
2.3
54.2
2023Wisconsin
2.8
58.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.