Skip to content
Bijan Robinson

#5Bijan Robinson

RB·Texas·202220212.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Bijan Robinson is a 2-year Featured Back for Texas. Bijan's 2021 season ranks in the 30th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 218 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bijan Robinson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
1127 Rush yards11 Rush TD195 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
26 Receptions295 Rec yards4 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency30
  • Volume95
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency64
  • Receiving53
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)30th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.05 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Rice (SP+ -23).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0501.05Wk 1 vs Louisiana: +0.54 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas: -0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Rice: +1.05 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas Tech: +0.48 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs TCU: +0.16 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oklahoma: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Oklahoma State: +0.48 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Baylor: -0.31 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Iowa State: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kansas: +0.46 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLouisianaW38-188.7201035.2147310.54
2@ArkansasL21-4013.819693.61140-0.13
3vsRiceW58-0-22.9131279.8311401.05
4vsTexas TechW70-359.8181377.6025410.48
5@TCUW32-27-0.6352166.2222200.16
6vsOklahomaL48-5516.8201376.911200.15
7vsOklahoma StateL24-3217.2211356.4233810.48
9@BaylorL24-3115.617432.51140-0.31
10@Iowa StateL7-3014.318905.0083600.17
11vsKansasL56-57-19.714705.0034810.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
33.2%
Passing plays
9.7%
Rushing plays
53.8%
Standard downs
37.0%
Passing downs
24.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
0.72 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.200−0.632022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Texas
2.7
60.6
2022Texas
5.9
107.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.